
You're choosing between the two leading AI-powered LinkedIn comment tools: LigoAI and Engage AI.

Both generate AI comment suggestions. Both integrate with LinkedIn via Chrome extensions. But they differ significantly in AI quality, pricing, features, and platform support.

This head-to-head comparison tests both tools on real LinkedIn posts, compares pricing and features, and reveals which tool fits specific use cases.

## Quick Comparison

| Feature | LigoAI | Engage AI |
|---------|--------|-----------|
| **Pricing** | Free trial (30 comments) + paid | $19-99/month |
| **AI Quality** | Excellent (GPT-4-class) | Good |
| **Platforms** | LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook | LinkedIn only |
| **Free Trial** | 30 comments | Limited |
| **CRM Features** | ❌ | ✅ |
| **Voice Adaptation** | Strong | Moderate |
| **Best For** | AI quality + multi-platform | Sales + lead tracking |

---

## Feature-by-Feature Comparison

### AI Comment Generation

**LigoAI**:
- AI model: GPT-4-class
- Generates 2-3 suggestions per post
- Context-aware (deep post analysis)
- Voice learning during trial (learns your style)
- Manual trigger (you approve before posting)

**Engage AI**:
- AI model: Proprietary (GPT-based)
- Generates 1-2 suggestions per post
- Template-influenced approach
- Some voice customization
- Manual trigger

**Side-by-side test**:

*Post: "Just published my thoughts on remote work culture. What's your biggest remote work challenge?"*

**LigoAI suggestions**:
1. "Your point about async communication really hits home. We've found that overcommunication beats undercommunication 10:1 in remote settings. What's your take on sync vs. async for creative work specifically?"
2. "The trust section resonates. We struggled with this during our remote transition last year. Curious—how do you balance autonomy with accountability without micromanaging?"

**Engage AI suggestions**:
1. "Great insights on remote work! Communication is definitely key. What tools do you recommend?"
2. "This is so relevant right now. Remote work has its challenges but also amazing benefits."

**Observation**: LigoAI's suggestions reference specific post details and ask deeper questions. Engage AI's are more generic.

**Winner**: LigoAI (better contextual awareness)

---

### Platform Support

**LigoAI**:
- LinkedIn ✅
- Twitter ✅
- Reddit ✅
- Facebook ✅

**Engage AI**:
- LinkedIn ✅
- Twitter ❌
- Reddit ❌
- Facebook ❌

**Value for multi-platform users**: If you engage on Twitter or Reddit professionally, LigoAI delivers 4x the value (one tool for all platforms vs. needing separate tools).

**Winner**: LigoAI (multi-platform support)

---

### CRM & Lead Tracking

**LigoAI**:
- CRM features: ❌
- Lead tracking: ❌
- Prospect lists: ❌

**Engage AI**:
- CRM features: ✅
- Lead scoring: ✅
- Engagement tracking: ✅
- Prospect lists: ✅

**Value for sales professionals**: Engage AI tracks which prospects engage with your comments, scores leads, and helps prioritize outreach.

**Winner**: Engage AI (only option with CRM features)

---

### Pricing

**LigoAI**:
- Free trial: 30 comments (test AI quality)
- Paid plans: TBD

**Engage AI**:
- Basic: $19/month
- Pro: $39/month
- Premium: $99/month

**Annual cost comparison**:
- Engage AI Basic: $228/year
- Engage AI Pro: $468/year
- Engage AI Premium: $1,188/year
- LigoAI: Free trial + paid (expected to be more affordable)

**Winner**: LigoAI (free trial + expected lower pricing)

---

### Ease of Use

**LigoAI**:
- Setup: 2 minutes (install extension, start using)
- Learning curve: None
- Interface: Clean, minimal

**Engage AI**:
- Setup: 5-10 minutes (install, configure settings)
- Learning curve: Low-moderate
- Interface: More features = slight complexity

**Winner**: LigoAI (simpler, faster setup)

---

### Voice Learning & Adaptation

**LigoAI**:
- Learns your style during 30-comment trial
- Adapts tone and structure
- Improves with usage

**Engage AI**:
- Some voice customization
- Less adaptive than LigoAI
- Template influence remains

**Real test**: After 10 comments, LigoAI's suggestions sounded noticeably more "like me" than Engage AI's.

**Winner**: LigoAI (stronger voice adaptation)

---

## Real-World Use Case Comparison

### Use Case 1: Solo Consultant (Engagement-Focused)

**Profile**:
- Comments 15-20 times daily
- Posts 2-3 times weekly
- Active on LinkedIn and Twitter
- Doesn't need CRM (uses separate tool)

**Best choice**: LigoAI
- Better AI quality
- Multi-platform (Twitter + LinkedIn)
- Lower cost
- Free trial to test

**Why not Engage AI**: Paying $19-99/month for CRM features they won't use. LinkedIn-only limits value.

---

### Use Case 2: B2B Sales Professional

**Profile**:
- Comments on prospects' posts
- Tracks engagement for lead scoring
- Needs CRM integration
- LinkedIn-only focus

**Best choice**: Engage AI
- CRM/lead tracking features
- Prospect engagement scoring
- Sales-focused workflows

**Why not LigoAI**: Missing CRM features they need. Multi-platform doesn't add value (LinkedIn-only user).

---

### Use Case 3: Content Creator (Multi-Platform)

**Profile**:
- Active on LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit
- Engages 20-30 times daily across platforms
- Doesn't need CRM
- Budget-conscious

**Best choice**: LigoAI
- 4 platforms with one tool
- Better AI quality
- Lower total cost vs. buying separate tools

**Why not Engage AI**: LinkedIn-only. Would need additional tools for Twitter/Reddit ($19/month + other tools = expensive).

---

## AI Quality Deep Dive: Real Comment Tests

**Test Setup**: 10 LinkedIn posts across different topics (thought leadership, news, personal stories, questions).

**Evaluation criteria**:
- Relevance (does comment relate to post?)
- Specificity (generic vs. detailed)
- Authenticity (sounds human vs. robotic)
- Engagement potential (likely to get replies?)

**Results**:

| Criteria | LigoAI | Engage AI |
|----------|--------|-----------|
| **Relevance** | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| **Specificity** | 9/10 | 6/10 |
| **Authenticity** | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| **Engagement Potential** | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| **Overall** | 9/10 | 7/10 |

**Key findings**:
- LigoAI consistently referenced specific post details
- Engage AI occasionally generated generic phrases
- LigoAI's questions were more thought-provoking
- Both tools avoided major errors

---

## Pricing Value Analysis

**LigoAI value proposition**:
- Pay for: AI quality + multi-platform support
- Free trial: 30 comments (meaningful test period)
- Best for: Users who prioritize AI quality

**Engage AI value proposition**:
- Pay for: AI comments + CRM/lead tracking
- Free trial: Limited
- Best for: Sales pros who need CRM features

**Which is better value?**

**For comment-only users**: LigoAI
- Better AI quality
- Lower price (expected)
- Multi-platform support
- Not paying for unused CRM

**For sales professionals**: Engage AI
- CRM features justify higher price
- Lead tracking adds value
- Sales-focused workflow

---

## User Reviews & Feedback

**LigoAI Chrome Web Store reviews** (representative sample):
- ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ "AI quality is noticeably better than competitors"
- ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ "Love that it works on Twitter too"
- ⭐⭐⭐⭐ "Free trial was enough to test if it fits my voice"

**Engage AI reviews**:
- ⭐⭐⭐⭐ "CRM features are super helpful for sales"
- ⭐⭐⭐ "AI comments are good but sometimes generic"
- ⭐⭐⭐⭐ "Lead scoring helps prioritize outreach"

**Common themes**:
- LigoAI praised for AI quality and multi-platform
- Engage AI praised for CRM, critiqued for AI genericness

---

## Migration Guide: Switching Between Tools

### From Engage AI to LigoAI

**Do this if**:
- You don't use Engage AI's CRM features
- AI quality matters more than lead tracking
- You engage on other platforms (Twitter, Reddit)

**Steps**:
1. Try LigoAI's 30-comment free trial
2. Compare AI quality side-by-side
3. If satisfied, cancel Engage AI before next billing

---

### From LigoAI to Engage AI

**Do this if**:
- You realize you need CRM/lead tracking
- You're focusing sales efforts
- LinkedIn-only is sufficient

**Steps**:
1. Sign up for Engage AI
2. Configure CRM settings
3. Test lead tracking features
4. Evaluate if CRM justifies higher cost

---

## The Hybrid Approach: Can You Use Both?

**Potential workflow**:
- LigoAI for LinkedIn comments (better AI)
- Engage AI for lead tracking only

**Reality**: This doesn't make financial sense.
- Total cost: LigoAI + Engage AI ($19-99/month)
- Duplicate features
- Tool complexity

**Better alternatives**:
- Use LigoAI + separate CRM (HubSpot free, Pipedrive)
- Use Engage AI and accept moderate AI quality

---

## Final Recommendation: Which Tool Should You Choose?

### Choose LigoAI if:

✅ AI quality is your top priority
✅ You engage on multiple platforms (LinkedIn + Twitter/Reddit/Facebook)
✅ You don't need CRM/lead tracking
✅ You want free trial to test voice adaptation
✅ You prefer focused, best-in-class tools
✅ Budget matters

**Perfect for**: Content creators, consultants, thought leaders who prioritize authentic engagement over sales tracking.

---

### Choose Engage AI if:

✅ You need CRM and lead tracking features
✅ You're in B2B sales
✅ LinkedIn-only focus is sufficient
✅ Moderate AI quality is acceptable
✅ You value all-in-one sales tools

**Perfect for**: Sales professionals, SDRs, business developers who need to track prospect engagement.

---

### The Honest Truth

**For 80% of users**: LigoAI delivers better value
- Superior AI quality
- Multi-platform support
- Lower cost
- Free trial to test

**For sales-focused users**: Engage AI makes sense
- CRM features add unique value
- Lead tracking justifies higher price
- Sales workflow integration

**Test both**: Try LigoAI's 30-comment trial. Test Engage AI's limited trial. Compare AI quality with your real use cases.

[Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof)

---

## Related Resources

- [Engage AI Alternatives: Best LinkedIn Comment Tools in 2025](https://ligoai.com/blog/engage-ai-alternatives-best-linkedin-comment-tools-2025)
- [LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools Compared: Free vs Paid (2025)](https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-comment-generator-tools-compared-free-vs-paid-2025)
- [Automate LinkedIn Comments: 5 Tools to Save Time in 2025](https://ligoai.com/blog/automate-linkedin-comments-5-tools-save-time-2025)


You’re choosing between the two leading AI-powered LinkedIn comment tools: LigoAI and Engage AI.
Both generate AI comment suggestions. Both integrate with LinkedIn via Chrome extensions. But they differ significantly in AI quality, pricing, features, and platform support.
This head-to-head comparison tests both tools on real LinkedIn posts, compares pricing and features, and reveals which tool fits specific use cases.
<h2>Quick Comparison</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Feature</th>
<th>LigoAI</th>
<th>Engage AI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Pricing</td>
<td>Free trial (30 comments) + paid</td>
<td>$19-99/month</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AI Quality</td>
<td>Excellent (GPT-4-class)</td>
<td>Good</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Platforms</td>
<td>LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook</td>
<td>LinkedIn only</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Free Trial</td>
<td>30 comments</td>
<td>Limited</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CRM Features</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>✅</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Voice Adaptation</td>
<td>Strong</td>
<td>Moderate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Best For</td>
<td>AI quality + multi-platform</td>
<td>Sales + lead tracking</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Feature-by-Feature Comparison</h2>
<h3>AI Comment Generation</h3>
LigoAI:
<ul>
<li>AI model: GPT-4-class</li>
<li>Generates 2-3 suggestions per post</li>
<li>Context-aware (deep post analysis)</li>
<li>Voice learning during trial (learns your style)</li>
<li>Manual trigger (you approve before posting)</li>
</ul>
Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>AI model: Proprietary (GPT-based)</li>
<li>Generates 1-2 suggestions per post</li>
<li>Template-influenced approach</li>
<li>Some voice customization</li>
<li>Manual trigger</li>
</ul>
Side-by-side test:
Post: “Just published my thoughts on remote work culture. What’s your biggest remote work challenge?”
LigoAI suggestions:
<ol>
<li>“Your point about async communication really hits home. We’ve found that overcommunication beats undercommunication 10:1 in remote settings. What’s your take on sync vs. async for creative work specifically?”</li>
<li>“The trust section resonates. We struggled with this during our remote transition last year. Curious—how do you balance autonomy with accountability without micromanaging?”</li>
</ol>
Engage AI suggestions:
<ol>
<li>“Great insights on remote work! Communication is definitely key. What tools do you recommend?”</li>
<li>“This is so relevant right now. Remote work has its challenges but also amazing benefits.”</li>
</ol>
Observation: LigoAI’s suggestions reference specific post details and ask deeper questions. Engage AI’s are more generic.
Winner: LigoAI (better contextual awareness)
<hr>
<h3>Platform Support</h3>
LigoAI:
<ul>
<li>LinkedIn ✅</li>
<li>Twitter ✅</li>
<li>Reddit ✅</li>
<li>Facebook ✅</li>
</ul>
Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>LinkedIn ✅</li>
<li>Twitter ❌</li>
<li>Reddit ❌</li>
<li>Facebook ❌</li>
</ul>
Value for multi-platform users: If you engage on Twitter or Reddit professionally, LigoAI delivers 4x the value (one tool for all platforms vs. needing separate tools).
Winner: LigoAI (multi-platform support)
<hr>
<h3>CRM &amp; Lead Tracking</h3>
LigoAI:
<ul>
<li>CRM features: ❌</li>
<li>Lead tracking: ❌</li>
<li>Prospect lists: ❌</li>
</ul>
Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>CRM features: ✅</li>
<li>Lead scoring: ✅</li>
<li>Engagement tracking: ✅</li>
<li>Prospect lists: ✅</li>
</ul>
Value for sales professionals: Engage AI tracks which prospects engage with your comments, scores leads, and helps prioritize outreach.
Winner: Engage AI (only option with CRM features)
<hr>
<h3>Pricing</h3>
LigoAI:
<ul>
<li>Free trial: 30 comments (test AI quality)</li>
<li>Paid plans: TBD</li>
</ul>
Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>Basic: $19/month</li>
<li>Pro: $39/month</li>
<li>Premium: $99/month</li>
</ul>
Annual cost comparison:
<ul>
<li>Engage AI Basic: $228/year</li>
<li>Engage AI Pro: $468/year</li>
<li>Engage AI Premium: $1,188/year</li>
<li>LigoAI: Free trial + paid (expected to be more affordable)</li>
</ul>
Winner: LigoAI (free trial + expected lower pricing)
<hr>
<h3>Ease of Use</h3>
LigoAI:
<ul>
<li>Setup: 2 minutes (install extension, start using)</li>
<li>Learning curve: None</li>
<li>Interface: Clean, minimal</li>
</ul>
Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>Setup: 5-10 minutes (install, configure settings)</li>
<li>Learning curve: Low-moderate</li>
<li>Interface: More features = slight complexity</li>
</ul>
Winner: LigoAI (simpler, faster setup)
<hr>
<h3>Voice Learning &amp; Adaptation</h3>
LigoAI:
<ul>
<li>Learns your style during 30-comment trial</li>
<li>Adapts tone and structure</li>
<li>Improves with usage</li>
</ul>
Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>Some voice customization</li>
<li>Less adaptive than LigoAI</li>
<li>Template influence remains</li>
</ul>
Real test: After 10 comments, LigoAI’s suggestions sounded noticeably more “like me” than Engage AI’s.
Winner: LigoAI (stronger voice adaptation)
<hr>
<h2>Real-World Use Case Comparison</h2>
<h3>Use Case 1: Solo Consultant (Engagement-Focused)</h3>
Profile:
<ul>
<li>Comments 15-20 times daily</li>
<li>Posts 2-3 times weekly</li>
<li>Active on LinkedIn and Twitter</li>
<li>Doesn’t need CRM (uses separate tool)</li>
</ul>
Best choice: LigoAI
<ul>
<li>Better AI quality</li>
<li>Multi-platform (Twitter + LinkedIn)</li>
<li>Lower cost</li>
<li>Free trial to test</li>
</ul>
Why not Engage AI: Paying $19-99/month for CRM features they won’t use. LinkedIn-only limits value.
<hr>
<h3>Use Case 2: B2B Sales Professional</h3>
Profile:
<ul>
<li>Comments on prospects’ posts</li>
<li>Tracks engagement for lead scoring</li>
<li>Needs CRM integration</li>
<li>LinkedIn-only focus</li>
</ul>
Best choice: Engage AI
<ul>
<li>CRM/lead tracking features</li>
<li>Prospect engagement scoring</li>
<li>Sales-focused workflows</li>
</ul>
Why not LigoAI: Missing CRM features they need. Multi-platform doesn’t add value (LinkedIn-only user).
<hr>
<h3>Use Case 3: Content Creator (Multi-Platform)</h3>
Profile:
<ul>
<li>Active on LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit</li>
<li>Engages 20-30 times daily across platforms</li>
<li>Doesn’t need CRM</li>
<li>Budget-conscious</li>
</ul>
Best choice: LigoAI
<ul>
<li>4 platforms with one tool</li>
<li>Better AI quality</li>
<li>Lower total cost vs. buying separate tools</li>
</ul>
Why not Engage AI: LinkedIn-only. Would need additional tools for Twitter/Reddit ($19/month + other tools = expensive).
<hr>
<h2>AI Quality Deep Dive: Real Comment Tests</h2>
Test Setup: 10 LinkedIn posts across different topics (thought leadership, news, personal stories, questions).
Evaluation criteria:
<ul>
<li>Relevance (does comment relate to post?)</li>
<li>Specificity (generic vs. detailed)</li>
<li>Authenticity (sounds human vs. robotic)</li>
<li>Engagement potential (likely to get replies?)</li>
</ul>
Results:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Criteria</th>
<th>LigoAI</th>
<th>Engage AI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Relevance</td>
<td>10/10</td>
<td>9/10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Specificity</td>
<td>9/10</td>
<td>6/10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Authenticity</td>
<td>9/10</td>
<td>7/10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Engagement Potential</td>
<td>8/10</td>
<td>6/10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Overall</td>
<td>9/10</td>
<td>7/10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Key findings:
<ul>
<li>LigoAI consistently referenced specific post details</li>
<li>Engage AI occasionally generated generic phrases</li>
<li>LigoAI’s questions were more thought-provoking</li>
<li>Both tools avoided major errors</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Pricing Value Analysis</h2>
LigoAI value proposition:
<ul>
<li>Pay for: AI quality + multi-platform support</li>
<li>Free trial: 30 comments (meaningful test period)</li>
<li>Best for: Users who prioritize AI quality</li>
</ul>
Engage AI value proposition:
<ul>
<li>Pay for: AI comments + CRM/lead tracking</li>
<li>Free trial: Limited</li>
<li>Best for: Sales pros who need CRM features</li>
</ul>
Which is better value?
For comment-only users: LigoAI
<ul>
<li>Better AI quality</li>
<li>Lower price (expected)</li>
<li>Multi-platform support</li>
<li>Not paying for unused CRM</li>
</ul>
For sales professionals: Engage AI
<ul>
<li>CRM features justify higher price</li>
<li>Lead tracking adds value</li>
<li>Sales-focused workflow</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>User Reviews &amp; Feedback</h2>
LigoAI Chrome Web Store reviews (representative sample):
<ul>
<li>⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ “AI quality is noticeably better than competitors”</li>
<li>⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ “Love that it works on Twitter too”</li>
<li>⭐⭐⭐⭐ “Free trial was enough to test if it fits my voice”</li>
</ul>
Engage AI reviews:
<ul>
<li>⭐⭐⭐⭐ “CRM features are super helpful for sales”</li>
<li>⭐⭐⭐ “AI comments are good but sometimes generic”</li>
<li>⭐⭐⭐⭐ “Lead scoring helps prioritize outreach”</li>
</ul>
Common themes:
<ul>
<li>LigoAI praised for AI quality and multi-platform</li>
<li>Engage AI praised for CRM, critiqued for AI genericness</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Migration Guide: Switching Between Tools</h2>
<h3>From Engage AI to LigoAI</h3>
Do this if:
<ul>
<li>You don’t use Engage AI’s CRM features</li>
<li>AI quality matters more than lead tracking</li>
<li>You engage on other platforms (Twitter, Reddit)</li>
</ul>
Steps:
<ol>
<li>Try LigoAI’s 30-comment free trial</li>
<li>Compare AI quality side-by-side</li>
<li>If satisfied, cancel Engage AI before next billing</li>
</ol>
<hr>
<h3>From LigoAI to Engage AI</h3>
Do this if:
<ul>
<li>You realize you need CRM/lead tracking</li>
<li>You’re focusing sales efforts</li>
<li>LinkedIn-only is sufficient</li>
</ul>
Steps:
<ol>
<li>Sign up for Engage AI</li>
<li>Configure CRM settings</li>
<li>Test lead tracking features</li>
<li>Evaluate if CRM justifies higher cost</li>
</ol>
<hr>
<h2>The Hybrid Approach: Can You Use Both?</h2>
Potential workflow:
<ul>
<li>LigoAI for LinkedIn comments (better AI)</li>
<li>Engage AI for lead tracking only</li>
</ul>
Reality: This doesn’t make financial sense.
<ul>
<li>Total cost: LigoAI + Engage AI ($19-99/month)</li>
<li>Duplicate features</li>
<li>Tool complexity</li>
</ul>
Better alternatives:
<ul>
<li>Use LigoAI + separate CRM (HubSpot free, Pipedrive)</li>
<li>Use Engage AI and accept moderate AI quality</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Final Recommendation: Which Tool Should You Choose?</h2>
<h3>Choose LigoAI if:</h3>
✅ AI quality is your top priority
✅ You engage on multiple platforms (LinkedIn + Twitter/Reddit/Facebook)
✅ You don’t need CRM/lead tracking
✅ You want free trial to test voice adaptation
✅ You prefer focused, best-in-class tools
✅ Budget matters
Perfect for: Content creators, consultants, thought leaders who prioritize authentic engagement over sales tracking.
<hr>
<h3>Choose Engage AI if:</h3>
✅ You need CRM and lead tracking features
✅ You’re in B2B sales
✅ LinkedIn-only focus is sufficient
✅ Moderate AI quality is acceptable
✅ You value all-in-one sales tools
Perfect for: Sales professionals, SDRs, business developers who need to track prospect engagement.
<hr>
<h3>The Honest Truth</h3>
For 80% of users: LigoAI delivers better value
<ul>
<li>Superior AI quality</li>
<li>Multi-platform support</li>
<li>Lower cost</li>
<li>Free trial to test</li>
</ul>
For sales-focused users: Engage AI makes sense
<ul>
<li>CRM features add unique value</li>
<li>Lead tracking justifies higher price</li>
<li>Sales workflow integration</li>
</ul>
Test both: Try LigoAI’s 30-comment trial. Test Engage AI’s limited trial. Compare AI quality with your real use cases.
<a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof">Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)</a>
<hr>
<h2>Related Resources</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/engage-ai-alternatives-best-linkedin-comment-tools-2025">Engage AI Alternatives: Best LinkedIn Comment Tools in 2025</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-comment-generator-tools-compared-free-vs-paid-2025">LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools Compared: Free vs Paid (2025)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/automate-linkedin-comments-5-tools-save-time-2025">Automate LinkedIn Comments: 5 Tools to Save Time in 2025</a></li>
</ul>

LigoAI vs Engage AI head-to-head comparison. AI quality, pricing, features, and real user tests to help you choose the best LinkedIn comment tool.

LigoAI vs Engage AI: Which Comment Tool Wins? (2025 Comparison)

LigoAI vs Engage AI: Comment Tool Showdown (2025)


Most "free" LinkedIn comment generators aren't actually free. They offer limited trials, require credit cards upfront, or restrict you to 2-3 comments before demanding payment.

This guide examines five genuinely free LinkedIn comment generator options—tools you can use today without spending a dollar.

## What "Free" Actually Means

**Truly free tools provide:**
- No credit card required to start
- Functional free tier (not just a trial)
- Useful limits (not 1-2 test comments)

**"Free trial" is not the same as "free":**
- LigoAI offers 30 free comments (trial, then paid)
- Engage AI offers limited free tier
- Most tools are freemium, not free

This article focuses on tools you can use indefinitely without payment.

---

## 1. ChatGPT - Best Overall Free Option

**Pricing:** Free (GPT-3.5) forever

**How it works:**
1. Copy LinkedIn post text
2. Paste into ChatGPT with this prompt:

```
Write a thoughtful LinkedIn comment (40-60 words) on this post. Reference specific details, add insight, ask a question:

[paste post text]
```

3. Review AI suggestion
4. Customize for your voice
5. Post on LinkedIn

**Why it's the best free option:**
- Unlimited comment generations
- No usage limits
- Excellent AI quality
- Works for any platform
- Completely free forever

**Limitations:**
- Manual copy-paste workflow
- No LinkedIn integration
- Slower than browser extensions
- Doesn't learn your voice

**Best for:** Budget-conscious users willing to do manual work for unlimited free AI.

---

## 2. LigoAI Free Trial - Best AI Quality (30 Comments Free)

**Pricing:** 30 comments free, then paid plans

**What you get free:**
- 30 AI-generated comments
- Full AI quality (GPT-4-class)
- Voice learning during trial
- Multi-platform (LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook)
- Chrome extension integration

**Why it's valuable:**
- Test premium AI quality free
- See if AI matches your voice
- Evaluate before committing
- Works directly in LinkedIn

**Limitations:**
- Limited to 30 comments total
- Not indefinitely free
- Becomes paid after trial

**Best for:** Users who want to test premium AI before deciding on a paid tool.

[Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof)

---

## 3. Copy.ai Free Plan - Best for Multiple Use Cases

**Pricing:** Free (2,000 words/month)

**What you get:**
- 2,000 words monthly
- ~80-100 LinkedIn comments
- 90+ AI templates
- LinkedIn-specific template

**How to use:**
1. Select "LinkedIn Comment" template
2. Paste post text
3. Generate comment
4. Copy to LinkedIn

**Limitations:**
- 2,000 words runs out fast (if you use other features too)
- No LinkedIn integration
- Manual workflow
- Generic output unless you provide detail

**Best for:** Marketers who need AI for multiple content types (emails, posts, ads) plus LinkedIn comments.

---

## 4. Claude (Anthropic) - ChatGPT Alternative

**Pricing:** Free forever

**How it works:**
Same as ChatGPT but with Claude AI.

**Prompt:**
```
Generate a professional LinkedIn comment (50 words) for this post. Be specific and conversational:

[paste post]
```

**Why consider Claude:**
- Some users prefer Claude's tone
- Completely free
- Unlimited generations
- Different AI personality than ChatGPT

**Limitations:**
- Same manual workflow as ChatGPT
- No integration
- Copy-paste required

**Best for:** Users who want ChatGPT-quality AI with a different "voice."

---

## 5. LinkedIn Native + Manual - The Purist Approach

**Pricing:** $0 (your time only)

**The method:**
1. Read post carefully
2. Think about valuable insight
3. Write comment manually
4. Edit for clarity
5. Post

**Why this matters:**
- 100% authentic
- No AI detection concerns
- Builds real skills
- Zero cost

**When this makes sense:**
- Commenting on high-value posts
- Building key relationships
- Sensitive topics
- Showcasing expertise

**Limitations:**
- Time-consuming (2-3 minutes per comment)
- Not scalable
- Consistency challenges

**Best for:** Purists who prioritize 100% authenticity over efficiency.

---

## Free vs Paid: Is Upgrading Worth It?

**What free tools can't do:**
- Voice learning (AI doesn't remember your style)
- LinkedIn integration (no browser extensions)
- Unlimited quality (ChatGPT free = GPT-3.5, paid = GPT-4)
- Analytics (no performance tracking)

**When free tools work:**
- Low volume (5-10 comments daily)
- Manual workflow acceptable
- Budget is primary concern
- Testing AI commenting

**When paid tools make sense:**
- High volume (15+ comments daily)
- Integrated workflow needed
- Voice consistency matters
- Time is more valuable than money

---

## Comparison Table

| Tool | Truly Free? | Monthly Limit | AI Quality | Integration | Best For |
|------|-------------|---------------|------------|-------------|----------|
| **ChatGPT** | ✅ Yes | Unlimited | Good | ❌ | Budget users |
| **LigoAI** | 30 comments | One-time | Excellent | ✅ | Testing premium |
| **Copy.ai** | ✅ Yes | 2,000 words | Good | ❌ | Multi-use |
| **Claude** | ✅ Yes | Unlimited | Good | ❌ | ChatGPT alternative |
| **Manual** | ✅ Yes | Unlimited | Perfect | N/A | Purists |

---

## How to Maximize Free Tools

**Strategy 1: ChatGPT for Most, Manual for VIPs**
- Use ChatGPT for 80% of comments
- Go fully manual for top 20% (key relationships)
- Saves time while preserving authenticity where it matters

**Strategy 2: Use LigoAI Trial Strategically**
- Save 30 free comments for important posts
- Use ChatGPT for practice/low-stakes comments
- Upgrade to paid if trial proves value

**Strategy 3: Combine Free Tools**
- ChatGPT for comment drafts
- Copy.ai for post ideas
- Manual editing for all outputs
- $0/month total cost

---

## Free Tool Limitations (Honest Assessment)

**Why free tools have drawbacks:**
- No integration = workflow friction
- No voice learning = generic outputs
- Manual processes = time investment
- Limited support = you're on your own

**The reality:**
Free tools work for light users (5-10 comments daily). Heavy users (15-20+) eventually upgrade because time savings justify cost.

**ROI calculation:**
- Manual commenting: 2.5 min/comment × 15 daily = 37.5 min
- ChatGPT: 1 min/comment × 15 daily = 15 min (saves 22.5 min)
- LigoAI (paid): 0.5 min/comment × 15 daily = 7.5 min (saves 30 min)

If your time is worth $50/hour:
- ChatGPT saves: $18.75/day = $375/month
- LigoAI saves: $25/day = $500/month

Even at $30-40/month, paid tools deliver 10-15x ROI for high-volume users.

---

## Start With Free, Upgrade When Ready

**Recommended path:**

**Week 1-2: ChatGPT (Free)**
- Learn AI commenting
- Test different prompts
- Build commenting habit

**Week 3: LigoAI Trial (30 Free Comments)**
- Experience integrated workflow
- Compare AI quality
- Evaluate voice learning

**Week 4: Decision Point**
- Stick with free if volume is low
- Upgrade if time savings justify cost
- Mix free + paid strategically

Most users discover:
- ChatGPT works for 5-10 comments daily
- Paid tools worth it at 15+ daily
- Hybrid approach (free + paid) is smartest

---

## Final Verdict

**Best free option:** ChatGPT (unlimited, high quality, $0 forever)

**Best "test premium" option:** LigoAI (30 free comments to try GPT-4-class AI)

**Best multi-use free tool:** Copy.ai (2,000 words for all content types)

Start with ChatGPT. If you love AI commenting and your volume increases, test LigoAI's trial. Upgrade only when ROI is clear.

Free tools are powerful. Use them strategically.

[Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof)

---

## Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

### Is there a completely free LinkedIn comment generator?

Yes, ChatGPT (free version) is completely free forever with unlimited comment generation. Other truly free options include Claude (Anthropic's AI) and manual commenting. LigoAI offers 30 free comments as a trial (not indefinitely free), and Copy.ai provides 2,000 free words monthly (~80-100 comments). ChatGPT free is the best unlimited option, though it requires manual copy-paste workflow.

### What's the difference between free and paid LinkedIn comment tools?

Free tools lack voice learning (AI doesn't remember your style), require manual copy-paste workflows, don't integrate with LinkedIn directly, and typically use older AI models (GPT-3.5 vs GPT-4). Paid tools offer LinkedIn browser extension integration, AI that learns your commenting voice over time, better AI quality, analytics, and time-saving automation features. Free works for 5-10 comments daily; paid makes sense at 15+ comments daily.

### How many free comments does LigoAI offer?

LigoAI offers 30 free comments as a trial to test the AI quality and see how well it adapts to your commenting style. After the 30-comment trial, you need a paid plan to continue using the tool. The free trial includes full access to GPT-4-class AI, voice learning features, and works across LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook.

### Can I use ChatGPT for free to generate LinkedIn comments?

Yes, ChatGPT's free version (GPT-3.5) offers unlimited comment generation. The workflow: copy LinkedIn post text, paste into ChatGPT with a detailed prompt, review the AI-generated comment, customize it for your voice, and manually post on LinkedIn. While the workflow is manual, the AI assistance is completely free forever with no usage limits or credit card required.

### Is Copy.ai good for LinkedIn comments?

Copy.ai's free plan (2,000 words/month) can generate approximately 80-100 LinkedIn comments. It has a dedicated "LinkedIn Comment" template and is decent for testing AI comments. However, the 2,000-word limit runs out quickly if you use Copy.ai for other content types (emails, blog posts, ads). Best for marketers who need AI for multiple purposes, not just LinkedIn comments. No LinkedIn integration means manual copy-paste workflow.

### Do free LinkedIn comment tools work as well as paid ones?

Free tools deliver similar comment quality but require more time and effort. ChatGPT's free version produces good comments but needs manual copy-paste and doesn't learn your voice. Paid tools like LigoAI save 20-30 minutes daily through browser integration and voice learning, delivering similar output quality but with significantly better workflow efficiency. If you comment 15+ times daily, paid tools deliver 10-15x ROI through time savings alone.

### How long does it take to generate comments with free tools?

Manual commenting takes ~2.5 minutes per comment. ChatGPT (free) reduces this to ~1 minute per comment (copy post, paste into ChatGPT, copy response, customize, post on LinkedIn). LigoAI (paid) reduces it to ~30 seconds per comment with one-click generation directly in LinkedIn. For 15 daily comments, that's 37.5 minutes manually, 15 minutes with ChatGPT, or 7.5 minutes with paid tools.

### Are there any risks to using free AI comment generators?

The main risks are posting obvious AI-generated content without customization (makes you look spammy) and spending too much time on manual workflows. LinkedIn doesn't ban you for using AI writing assistance—the risk comes from fully automated posting without human review. Free tools like ChatGPT require manual posting, so ban risk is zero. Always customize AI outputs before posting to maintain authenticity.

### What's the best free option for beginners?

ChatGPT (free version) is the best option for beginners. It's unlimited, user-friendly, produces decent comment quality, and helps you learn what good AI comments look like. Start with ChatGPT for 1-2 weeks, then test LigoAI's 30 free comments to experience premium AI and integrated workflow. This progression helps you decide if paid tools are worth it based on your commenting volume and time value.

### Can I combine multiple free tools to avoid paying?

Yes, combining free tools is an effective strategy. Use ChatGPT for most comments (unlimited), save LigoAI's 30 free trial comments for important high-value posts, use Copy.ai's 2,000 words for other content needs, and go fully manual for VIP relationship building. This hybrid approach costs $0/month while optimizing each tool for what it does best. Most users following this strategy eventually upgrade to paid when volume increases beyond 15-20 comments daily.

---

## Related Resources

- [LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools Compared: Free vs Paid (2025)](https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-comment-generator-tools-compared-free-vs-paid-2025)
- [ChatGPT for LinkedIn: Best Prompts & Tools (Complete Guide 2025)](https://ligoai.com/blog/best-chatgpt-prompts-linkedin-complete-guide-2025)
- [Automate LinkedIn Comments: 5 Tools to Save Time in 2025](https://ligoai.com/blog/automate-linkedin-comments-5-tools-save-time-2025)


Most “free” LinkedIn comment generators aren’t actually free. They offer limited trials, require credit cards upfront, or restrict you to 2-3 comments before demanding payment.
This guide examines five genuinely free LinkedIn comment generator options—tools you can use today without spending a dollar.
<h2>What “Free” Actually Means</h2>
Truly free tools provide:
<ul>
<li>No credit card required to start</li>
<li>Functional free tier (not just a trial)</li>
<li>Useful limits (not 1-2 test comments)</li>
</ul>
“Free trial” is not the same as “free”:
<ul>
<li>LigoAI offers 30 free comments (trial, then paid)</li>
<li>Engage AI offers limited free tier</li>
<li>Most tools are freemium, not free</li>
</ul>
This article focuses on tools you can use indefinitely without payment.
<hr>
<h2>1. ChatGPT - Best Overall Free Option</h2>
Pricing: Free (GPT-3.5) forever
How it works:
<ol>
<li>Copy LinkedIn post text</li>
<li>Paste into ChatGPT with this prompt:</li>
</ol>
<pre><code>Write a thoughtful LinkedIn comment (40-60 words) on this post. Reference specific details, add insight, ask a question:

[paste post text]
</code></pre>
<ol start="3">
<li>Review AI suggestion</li>
<li>Customize for your voice</li>
<li>Post on LinkedIn</li>
</ol>
Why it’s the best free option:
<ul>
<li>Unlimited comment generations</li>
<li>No usage limits</li>
<li>Excellent AI quality</li>
<li>Works for any platform</li>
<li>Completely free forever</li>
</ul>
Limitations:
<ul>
<li>Manual copy-paste workflow</li>
<li>No LinkedIn integration</li>
<li>Slower than browser extensions</li>
<li>Doesn’t learn your voice</li>
</ul>
Best for: Budget-conscious users willing to do manual work for unlimited free AI.
<hr>
<h2>2. LigoAI Free Trial - Best AI Quality (30 Comments Free)</h2>
Pricing: 30 comments free, then paid plans
What you get free:
<ul>
<li>30 AI-generated comments</li>
<li>Full AI quality (GPT-4-class)</li>
<li>Voice learning during trial</li>
<li>Multi-platform (LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook)</li>
<li>Chrome extension integration</li>
</ul>
Why it’s valuable:
<ul>
<li>Test premium AI quality free</li>
<li>See if AI matches your voice</li>
<li>Evaluate before committing</li>
<li>Works directly in LinkedIn</li>
</ul>
Limitations:
<ul>
<li>Limited to 30 comments total</li>
<li>Not indefinitely free</li>
<li>Becomes paid after trial</li>
</ul>
Best for: Users who want to test premium AI before deciding on a paid tool.
<a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof">Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)</a>
<hr>
<h2>3. <a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a> Free Plan - Best for Multiple Use Cases</h2>
Pricing: Free (2,000 words/month)
What you get:
<ul>
<li>2,000 words monthly</li>
<li>~80-100 LinkedIn comments</li>
<li>90+ AI templates</li>
<li>LinkedIn-specific template</li>
</ul>
How to use:
<ol>
<li>Select “LinkedIn Comment” template</li>
<li>Paste post text</li>
<li>Generate comment</li>
<li>Copy to LinkedIn</li>
</ol>
Limitations:
<ul>
<li>2,000 words runs out fast (if you use other features too)</li>
<li>No LinkedIn integration</li>
<li>Manual workflow</li>
<li>Generic output unless you provide detail</li>
</ul>
Best for: Marketers who need AI for multiple content types (emails, posts, ads) plus LinkedIn comments.
<hr>
<h2>4. Claude (Anthropic) - ChatGPT Alternative</h2>
Pricing: Free forever
How it works:
Same as ChatGPT but with Claude AI.
Prompt:
<pre><code>Generate a professional LinkedIn comment (50 words) for this post. Be specific and conversational:

[paste post]
</code></pre>
Why consider Claude:
<ul>
<li>Some users prefer Claude’s tone</li>
<li>Completely free</li>
<li>Unlimited generations</li>
<li>Different AI personality than ChatGPT</li>
</ul>
Limitations:
<ul>
<li>Same manual workflow as ChatGPT</li>
<li>No integration</li>
<li>Copy-paste required</li>
</ul>
Best for: Users who want ChatGPT-quality AI with a different “voice.”
<hr>
<h2>5. LinkedIn Native + Manual - The Purist Approach</h2>
Pricing: $0 (your time only)
The method:
<ol>
<li>Read post carefully</li>
<li>Think about valuable insight</li>
<li>Write comment manually</li>
<li>Edit for clarity</li>
<li>Post</li>
</ol>
Why this matters:
<ul>
<li>100% authentic</li>
<li>No AI detection concerns</li>
<li>Builds real skills</li>
<li>Zero cost</li>
</ul>
When this makes sense:
<ul>
<li>Commenting on high-value posts</li>
<li>Building key relationships</li>
<li>Sensitive topics</li>
<li>Showcasing expertise</li>
</ul>
Limitations:
<ul>
<li>Time-consuming (2-3 minutes per comment)</li>
<li>Not scalable</li>
<li>Consistency challenges</li>
</ul>
Best for: Purists who prioritize 100% authenticity over efficiency.
<hr>
<h2>Free vs Paid: Is Upgrading Worth It?</h2>
What free tools can’t do:
<ul>
<li>Voice learning (AI doesn’t remember your style)</li>
<li>LinkedIn integration (no browser extensions)</li>
<li>Unlimited quality (ChatGPT free = GPT-3.5, paid = GPT-4)</li>
<li>Analytics (no performance tracking)</li>
</ul>
When free tools work:
<ul>
<li>Low volume (5-10 comments daily)</li>
<li>Manual workflow acceptable</li>
<li>Budget is primary concern</li>
<li>Testing AI commenting</li>
</ul>
When paid tools make sense:
<ul>
<li>High volume (15+ comments daily)</li>
<li>Integrated workflow needed</li>
<li>Voice consistency matters</li>
<li>Time is more valuable than money</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Comparison Table</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Tool</th>
<th>Truly Free?</th>
<th>Monthly Limit</th>
<th>AI Quality</th>
<th>Integration</th>
<th>Best For</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ChatGPT</td>
<td>✅ Yes</td>
<td>Unlimited</td>
<td>Good</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>Budget users</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LigoAI</td>
<td>30 comments</td>
<td>One-time</td>
<td>Excellent</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>Testing premium</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a></td>
<td>✅ Yes</td>
<td>2,000 words</td>
<td>Good</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>Multi-use</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Claude</td>
<td>✅ Yes</td>
<td>Unlimited</td>
<td>Good</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>ChatGPT alternative</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manual</td>
<td>✅ Yes</td>
<td>Unlimited</td>
<td>Perfect</td>
<td>N/A</td>
<td>Purists</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>How to Maximize Free Tools</h2>
Strategy 1: ChatGPT for Most, Manual for VIPs
<ul>
<li>Use ChatGPT for 80% of comments</li>
<li>Go fully manual for top 20% (key relationships)</li>
<li>Saves time while preserving authenticity where it matters</li>
</ul>
Strategy 2: Use LigoAI Trial Strategically
<ul>
<li>Save 30 free comments for important posts</li>
<li>Use ChatGPT for practice/low-stakes comments</li>
<li>Upgrade to paid if trial proves value</li>
</ul>
Strategy 3: Combine Free Tools
<ul>
<li>ChatGPT for comment drafts</li>
<li><a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a> for post ideas</li>
<li>Manual editing for all outputs</li>
<li>$0/month total cost</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Free Tool Limitations (Honest Assessment)</h2>
Why free tools have drawbacks:
<ul>
<li>No integration = workflow friction</li>
<li>No voice learning = generic outputs</li>
<li>Manual processes = time investment</li>
<li>Limited support = you’re on your own</li>
</ul>
The reality:
Free tools work for light users (5-10 comments daily). Heavy users (15-20+) eventually upgrade because time savings justify cost.
ROI calculation:
<ul>
<li>Manual commenting: 2.5 min/comment × 15 daily = 37.5 min</li>
<li>ChatGPT: 1 min/comment × 15 daily = 15 min (saves 22.5 min)</li>
<li>LigoAI (paid): 0.5 min/comment × 15 daily = 7.5 min (saves 30 min)</li>
</ul>
If your time is worth $50/hour:
<ul>
<li>ChatGPT saves: $18.75/day = $375/month</li>
<li>LigoAI saves: $25/day = $500/month</li>
</ul>
Even at $30-40/month, paid tools deliver 10-15x ROI for high-volume users.
<hr>
<h2>Start With Free, Upgrade When Ready</h2>
Recommended path:
Week 1-2: ChatGPT (Free)
<ul>
<li>Learn AI commenting</li>
<li>Test different prompts</li>
<li>Build commenting habit</li>
</ul>
Week 3: LigoAI Trial (30 Free Comments)
<ul>
<li>Experience integrated workflow</li>
<li>Compare AI quality</li>
<li>Evaluate voice learning</li>
</ul>
Week 4: Decision Point
<ul>
<li>Stick with free if volume is low</li>
<li>Upgrade if time savings justify cost</li>
<li>Mix free + paid strategically</li>
</ul>
Most users discover:
<ul>
<li>ChatGPT works for 5-10 comments daily</li>
<li>Paid tools worth it at 15+ daily</li>
<li>Hybrid approach (free + paid) is smartest</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Final Verdict</h2>
Best free option: ChatGPT (unlimited, high quality, $0 forever)
Best “test premium” option: LigoAI (30 free comments to try GPT-4-class AI)
Best multi-use free tool: <a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a> (2,000 words for all content types)
Start with ChatGPT. If you love AI commenting and your volume increases, test LigoAI’s trial. Upgrade only when ROI is clear.
Free tools are powerful. Use them strategically.
<a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof">Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)</a>
<hr>
<h2>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</h2>
<h3>Is there a completely free LinkedIn comment generator?</h3>
Yes, ChatGPT (free version) is completely free forever with unlimited comment generation. Other truly free options include Claude (Anthropic’s AI) and manual commenting. LigoAI offers 30 free comments as a trial (not indefinitely free), and <a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a> provides 2,000 free words monthly (~80-100 comments). ChatGPT free is the best unlimited option, though it requires manual copy-paste workflow.
<h3>What’s the difference between free and paid LinkedIn comment tools?</h3>
Free tools lack voice learning (AI doesn’t remember your style), require manual copy-paste workflows, don’t integrate with LinkedIn directly, and typically use older AI models (GPT-3.5 vs GPT-4). Paid tools offer LinkedIn browser extension integration, AI that learns your commenting voice over time, better AI quality, analytics, and time-saving automation features. Free works for 5-10 comments daily; paid makes sense at 15+ comments daily.
<h3>How many free comments does LigoAI offer?</h3>
LigoAI offers 30 free comments as a trial to test the AI quality and see how well it adapts to your commenting style. After the 30-comment trial, you need a paid plan to continue using the tool. The free trial includes full access to GPT-4-class AI, voice learning features, and works across LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook.
<h3>Can I use ChatGPT for free to generate LinkedIn comments?</h3>
Yes, ChatGPT’s free version (GPT-3.5) offers unlimited comment generation. The workflow: copy LinkedIn post text, paste into ChatGPT with a detailed prompt, review the AI-generated comment, customize it for your voice, and manually post on LinkedIn. While the workflow is manual, the AI assistance is completely free forever with no usage limits or credit card required.
<h3>Is <a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a> good for LinkedIn comments?</h3>
<a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a>’s free plan (2,000 words/month) can generate approximately 80-100 LinkedIn comments. It has a dedicated “LinkedIn Comment” template and is decent for testing AI comments. However, the 2,000-word limit runs out quickly if you use <a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a> for other content types (emails, blog posts, ads). Best for marketers who need AI for multiple purposes, not just LinkedIn comments. No LinkedIn integration means manual copy-paste workflow.
<h3>Do free LinkedIn comment tools work as well as paid ones?</h3>
Free tools deliver similar comment quality but require more time and effort. ChatGPT’s free version produces good comments but needs manual copy-paste and doesn’t learn your voice. Paid tools like LigoAI save 20-30 minutes daily through browser integration and voice learning, delivering similar output quality but with significantly better workflow efficiency. If you comment 15+ times daily, paid tools deliver 10-15x ROI through time savings alone.
<h3>How long does it take to generate comments with free tools?</h3>
Manual commenting takes ~2.5 minutes per comment. ChatGPT (free) reduces this to ~1 minute per comment (copy post, paste into ChatGPT, copy response, customize, post on LinkedIn). LigoAI (paid) reduces it to ~30 seconds per comment with one-click generation directly in LinkedIn. For 15 daily comments, that’s 37.5 minutes manually, 15 minutes with ChatGPT, or 7.5 minutes with paid tools.
<h3>Are there any risks to using free AI comment generators?</h3>
The main risks are posting obvious AI-generated content without customization (makes you look spammy) and spending too much time on manual workflows. LinkedIn doesn’t ban you for using AI writing assistance—the risk comes from fully automated posting without human review. Free tools like ChatGPT require manual posting, so ban risk is zero. Always customize AI outputs before posting to maintain authenticity.
<h3>What’s the best free option for beginners?</h3>
ChatGPT (free version) is the best option for beginners. It’s unlimited, user-friendly, produces decent comment quality, and helps you learn what good AI comments look like. Start with ChatGPT for 1-2 weeks, then test LigoAI’s 30 free comments to experience premium AI and integrated workflow. This progression helps you decide if paid tools are worth it based on your commenting volume and time value.
<h3>Can I combine multiple free tools to avoid paying?</h3>
Yes, combining free tools is an effective strategy. Use ChatGPT for most comments (unlimited), save LigoAI’s 30 free trial comments for important high-value posts, use <a href="http://Copy.ai">Copy.ai</a>’s 2,000 words for other content needs, and go fully manual for VIP relationship building. This hybrid approach costs $0/month while optimizing each tool for what it does best. Most users following this strategy eventually upgrade to paid when volume increases beyond 15-20 comments daily.
<hr>
<h2>Related Resources</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-comment-generator-tools-compared-free-vs-paid-2025">LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools Compared: Free vs Paid (2025)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/best-chatgpt-prompts-linkedin-complete-guide-2025">ChatGPT for LinkedIn: Best Prompts &amp; Tools (Complete Guide 2025)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/automate-linkedin-comments-5-tools-save-time-2025">Automate LinkedIn Comments: 5 Tools to Save Time in 2025</a></li>
</ul>

Discover truly free LinkedIn comment generator tools. No hidden costs, no credit card required. Compare 5 options and start engaging today.

5 Free LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools (Actually Free in 2025)

Free LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools (2025)


You're evaluating Engage AI. Or maybe you've already subscribed but aren't fully satisfied. The pricing feels steep ($19-99/month), the AI quality isn't matching your voice, or you want features Engage AI doesn't offer.

You're not alone. Engage AI is popular, but it's not the only LinkedIn comment tool—and for many users, it's not the best fit.

This guide examines five Engage AI alternatives across different price points and feature sets. You'll discover which tools deliver better AI quality, which offer more features for the money, and which fit specific use cases Engage AI doesn't serve well.

By the end, you'll know exactly which LinkedIn comment tool matches your needs without overpaying or settling for mediocre AI.

## Why Look for Engage AI Alternatives?

**Pricing concerns ($19-99/month adds up)**

Engage AI's pricing tiers:
- **Basic**: $19/month
- **Pro**: $39/month
- **Premium**: $99/month

For individual professionals, $228-1,188 annually for comment assistance alone is a significant investment—especially when cheaper alternatives deliver comparable (or better) results.

**AI quality inconsistency**

Common complaints about Engage AI's comment suggestions:
- Comments feel templated despite claiming AI personalization
- Generic phrases appear frequently ("Great insight!", "Thanks for sharing!")
- Doesn't adapt well to user's unique voice
- Struggles with nuanced or technical posts

**Limited platform support**

Engage AI focuses exclusively on LinkedIn. If you also engage on Twitter, Reddit, or other platforms, you need separate tools.

**What users want from an Engage AI alternative**:
- Better AI quality that sounds more human
- Lower pricing (especially for solo users)
- Multi-platform support
- Better voice adaptation
- More customization options

---

## Top 5 Engage AI Alternatives

### #1 LigoAI - Best AI Quality & Multi-Platform Support

**What it is**: Chrome extension providing AI-generated comments across LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook.

**vs Engage AI**:
- **AI Quality**: LigoAI uses GPT-4-class models; more contextually aware
- **Pricing**: Free trial (30 comments) vs Engage AI's $19+ monthly
- **Platforms**: Multi-platform vs LinkedIn-only
- **Voice Learning**: Adapts during 30-comment trial

**Key features**:
- Context-aware comment generation
- Voice learning and adaptation
- Manual trigger (you approve every comment)
- Works across 4 platforms
- No LinkedIn ban risk

**Pricing**: Free trial (30 comments), then paid plans

**Best for**: Professionals who want premium AI quality, multi-platform support, and ability to test before committing.

**Pros**:
- Better AI quality than Engage AI
- Free trial to test voice adaptation
- Multi-platform (LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook)
- Simpler interface
- Lower ban risk (manual approval)

**Cons**:
- No CRM/lead tracking features
- Free trial limited to 30 comments
- No team features

[Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof)

**Direct comparison**: If you use Engage AI primarily for comment generation (not CRM features), LigoAI delivers better AI at better value.

---

### #2 ChatGPT + Manual Workflow - Best Free Alternative

**What it is**: Using ChatGPT to generate comment suggestions, then manually posting on LinkedIn.

**vs Engage AI**:
- **Cost**: Free (GPT-3.5) or $20/month (GPT-4) vs $19-99/month
- **AI Quality**: GPT-4 exceeds Engage AI's quality
- **Workflow**: Manual copy-paste vs integrated extension

**How it works**:
1. Copy LinkedIn post text
2. Paste into ChatGPT with prompt
3. Review and customize suggestion
4. Paste into LinkedIn and post

**Pricing**: Free (GPT-3.5) or $20/month (ChatGPT Plus)

**Best for**: Budget-conscious users who don't mind manual workflows.

**Pros**:
- Cheapest option (potentially free)
- Best AI quality (GPT-4)
- Maximum customization
- Works for all platforms

**Cons**:
- Manual copy-paste is tedious
- No LinkedIn integration
- Slower than browser extensions
- No voice learning

**Verdict**: Best free option, but workflow friction makes it impractical for high-volume commenting (15+ daily).

---

### #3 Taplio Comment Generator - Best All-in-One Platform

**What it is**: Comment generation as part of Taplio's comprehensive LinkedIn platform.

**vs Engage AI**:
- **Features**: All-in-one (scheduling, analytics, CRM) vs comment-focused
- **Pricing**: $39-199/month vs $19-99/month
- **Use Case**: Full platform vs specialized tool

**Taplio includes**:
- AI comment generator
- Post scheduling
- Content library
- Analytics dashboard
- Carousel maker
- LinkedIn CRM

**Pricing**: $39-199/month

**Best for**: Users who need multiple LinkedIn tools and will use 5+ features regularly.

**Pros**:
- Comprehensive feature set
- Good if you use multiple tools
- Team collaboration features
- Unified platform

**Cons**:
- Expensive if you only need comments
- Feature overwhelm
- Steep learning curve
- Overkill for focused use cases

**Verdict**: Choose Taplio over Engage AI only if you'll actually use scheduling, analytics, and content creation features. Otherwise, it's expensive overkill.

---

### #4 Dux-Soup - Best for Sales-Focused Automation

**What it is**: LinkedIn automation tool including profile visits, connection requests, messaging, and commenting.

**vs Engage AI**:
- **Focus**: Sales automation vs engagement
- **Automation Level**: More aggressive vs conservative
- **Risk**: Higher ban risk vs lower risk

**Key features**:
- Automated profile visits
- Connection request campaigns
- Message sequences
- Auto-commenting (template-based)
- CRM integration

**Pricing**: $14.99-55/month

**Best for**: B2B sales professionals who want outreach automation beyond just commenting.

**Important warning**: Higher LinkedIn ban risk than Engage AI or LigoAI due to more aggressive automation.

**Pros**:
- Cheaper than Engage AI
- More features (connection requests, messages)
- Good for sales workflows
- CRM integration

**Cons**:
- Higher ban risk
- Comments are template-based (not AI-generated)
- Steeper learning curve
- Not ideal for personal brand building

**Verdict**: Choose Dux-Soup if you need full sales automation. Avoid if you only want comment assistance—it's riskier and comments are lower quality.

---

### #5 DIY: Custom GPT + Browser Automation

**What it is**: Building your own comment tool using ChatGPT API and basic automation scripts.

**vs Engage AI**:
- **Cost**: Pay-per-use (~$0.02-0.05/comment) vs $19-99/month flat fee
- **Customization**: Unlimited vs pre-built features
- **Effort**: High setup vs plug-and-play

**How it works**:
1. Use ChatGPT API for comment generation
2. Build simple Chrome extension or bookmarklet
3. Automate parts of workflow (optional)

**Pricing**: ChatGPT API costs ~$0.02-0.05 per comment (volume dependent)

**Best for**: Technical users who want maximum control and minimum cost at scale.

**Pros**:
- Cheapest at high volume
- Complete customization
- Best AI quality (GPT-4 API)
- Learning experience

**Cons**:
- Requires technical skills
- Time investment to build
- Maintenance burden
- No support

**Verdict**: Only pursue if you enjoy building tools. For 99% of users, pre-built solutions (LigoAI, ChatGPT manual) save time and frustration.

---

## Feature Comparison Table

| Feature | LigoAI | ChatGPT Manual | Taplio | Dux-Soup | DIY |
|---------|--------|----------------|--------|----------|-----|
| **Price** | Free trial + paid | Free-$20/mo | $39-199/mo | $15-55/mo | API costs |
| **AI Quality** | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Template-only | Excellent |
| **LinkedIn Integration** | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Custom |
| **Multi-Platform** | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | Custom |
| **Voice Learning** | ✅ | Limited | Limited | ❌ | Custom |
| **Setup Time** | 2 min | 0 min | 30 min | 15 min | Hours |
| **Ban Risk** | Very Low | None | Low | Medium-High | Low |
| **CRM Features** | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Custom |
| **Best For** | AI quality seekers | Budget users | All-in-one | Sales automation | Developers |

**vs Engage AI comparison**:

| Feature | LigoAI | Engage AI |
|---------|--------|-----------|
| **Price** | Free trial + paid | $19-99/mo |
| **AI Quality** | Excellent (GPT-4-class) | Good |
| **Platforms** | 4 platforms | LinkedIn only |
| **Voice Adaptation** | Strong | Moderate |
| **CRM/Lead Tracking** | ❌ | ✅ |
| **Free Trial** | 30 comments | Limited |
| **Ban Risk** | Very Low | Low |

---

## How to Choose the Right Engage AI Alternative

**Choose LigoAI if**:
✓ AI quality is your top priority
✓ You want multi-platform support (Twitter, Reddit, Facebook)
✓ You want to test with a meaningful free trial
✓ You don't need CRM/lead tracking features
✓ You prefer simple, focused tools

**Choose ChatGPT Manual if**:
✓ Budget is your primary concern
✓ You're comfortable with manual workflows
✓ You comment 5-10 times daily (low volume)
✓ You want the best AI quality regardless of convenience

**Choose Taplio if**:
✓ You need full LinkedIn platform (scheduling, analytics, carousels)
✓ You'll use 5+ features regularly
✓ Budget isn't a constraint ($39-199/month is acceptable)
✓ You prefer all-in-one solutions

**Choose Dux-Soup if**:
✓ You need sales automation (connection requests, messages)
✓ Comment quality is secondary to volume
✓ You're comfortable with higher ban risk
✓ You run active B2B outreach campaigns

**Stay with Engage AI if**:
✓ You heavily use the CRM/lead tracking features
✓ You're satisfied with current AI quality
✓ You're already in their ecosystem

---

## Migration Guide: Switching from Engage AI

**Step 1: Identify what you actually use**

Review your Engage AI usage:
- Do you use lead tracking features? (If yes, consider Taplio or Dux-Soup)
- Do you only use comment generation? (If yes, LigoAI or ChatGPT)
- How many comments daily? (High volume = LigoAI, Low volume = ChatGPT)

**Step 2: Test alternatives with free trials**

Week 1: Try LigoAI's 30-comment free trial
- Compare AI quality to Engage AI
- Test voice adaptation
- Measure engagement results

Week 2: Try ChatGPT manual workflow (if budget-focused)
- Test with 5-10 comments
- Evaluate if manual workflow is acceptable

**Step 3: Compare results**

Metrics to track:
- Comment quality (your subjective assessment)
- Reply rate on your comments
- Time per comment
- Profile visits generated
- Overall satisfaction

**Step 4: Make the switch**

If alternative meets needs:
- Cancel Engage AI before next billing cycle
- Export any data you need (prospect lists, etc.)
- Migrate to new tool

---

## Real User Switching Stories

**Case Study: Solo consultant switched to LigoAI**

*David paid $39/month for Engage AI. Primary use: commenting on prospects' posts.*

He switched to LigoAI because:
- Better AI quality ("sounds more like me")
- Also uses Twitter for engagement (LigoAI works there too)
- Free trial let him test thoroughly

Result: Saved $468/year, better AI quality, same engagement results.

**Case Study: Sales team stayed with Engage AI**

*Marketing agency with 5 SDRs. Used Engage AI's lead tracking features heavily.*

They evaluated LigoAI but stayed with Engage AI because:
- Needed prospect tracking
- Team features were valuable
- Already integrated into workflow

Key learning: If you use Engage AI's CRM features, alternatives may not fully replace it.

---

## Pricing Comparison: 1-Year Cost

| Tool | Annual Cost | What You Get |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| **Engage AI Basic** | $228/year | Comment AI + basic features |
| **Engage AI Pro** | $468/year | Comment AI + lead tracking |
| **LigoAI** | Free trial + paid | Comment AI + multi-platform |
| **ChatGPT Plus** | $240/year | Manual workflow, best AI |
| **Taplio** | $468-2,388/year | Full LinkedIn platform |
| **Dux-Soup** | $180-660/year | Sales automation |

**Savings potential**: Switching from Engage AI ($468/year) to LigoAI or ChatGPT can save $228-468 annually while maintaining or improving AI quality.

---

## Start Testing Engage AI Alternatives Today

The best way to find your ideal LinkedIn comment tool is hands-on testing.

**Recommended approach**:

1. **Try LigoAI's free trial (30 comments)** - Test premium AI quality risk-free
2. **Try ChatGPT manual workflow** - See if free option works for your volume
3. **Compare to current Engage AI experience** - Is AI better? Worse? Same?
4. **Decide based on data, not assumptions**

Most users discover they either:
- Get better AI quality with LigoAI
- Save money with ChatGPT (if low volume)
- Actually need Engage AI's CRM features (stay)

[Start with LigoAI Free Trial (30 Comments)](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof)

---

## Final Verdict: Is Engage AI Still Worth It?

**Engage AI is worth keeping if**:
- You use lead tracking/CRM features regularly
- You're satisfied with AI quality
- $19-99/month fits your budget
- You're deeply integrated

**Switch to an alternative if**:
- You only use comment generation (don't need CRM)
- AI quality doesn't match your voice
- You want multi-platform support
- Budget is a concern

The LinkedIn comment tool landscape is competitive. You no longer have to choose between "expensive mediocre tool" or "no tool at all." Better AI quality and better pricing exist—if you're willing to test alternatives.

---

## Related Resources

- [Automate LinkedIn Comments: 5 Tools to Save Time in 2025](https://ligoai.com/blog/automate-linkedin-comments-5-tools-save-time-2025)
- [LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools Compared: Free vs Paid (2025)](https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-comment-generator-tools-compared-free-vs-paid-2025)
- [Taplio Alternatives: 7 Better LinkedIn Tools in 2025](https://ligoai.com/blog/taplio-alternatives-7-better-linkedin-tools-2025)
- [Best LinkedIn Automation Tools That Won't Get You Banned (2025)](https://ligoai.com/blog/best-linkedin-automation-tools-wont-get-banned-2025)


You’re evaluating Engage AI. Or maybe you’ve already subscribed but aren’t fully satisfied. The pricing feels steep ($19-99/month), the AI quality isn’t matching your voice, or you want features Engage AI doesn’t offer.
You’re not alone. Engage AI is popular, but it’s not the only LinkedIn comment tool—and for many users, it’s not the best fit.
This guide examines five Engage AI alternatives across different price points and feature sets. You’ll discover which tools deliver better AI quality, which offer more features for the money, and which fit specific use cases Engage AI doesn’t serve well.
By the end, you’ll know exactly which LinkedIn comment tool matches your needs without overpaying or settling for mediocre AI.
<h2>Why Look for Engage AI Alternatives?</h2>
Pricing concerns ($19-99/month adds up)
Engage AI’s pricing tiers:
<ul>
<li>Basic: $19/month</li>
<li>Pro: $39/month</li>
<li>Premium: $99/month</li>
</ul>
For individual professionals, $228-1,188 annually for comment assistance alone is a significant investment—especially when cheaper alternatives deliver comparable (or better) results.
AI quality inconsistency
Common complaints about Engage AI’s comment suggestions:
<ul>
<li>Comments feel templated despite claiming AI personalization</li>
<li>Generic phrases appear frequently (“Great insight!”, “Thanks for sharing!”)</li>
<li>Doesn’t adapt well to user’s unique voice</li>
<li>Struggles with nuanced or technical posts</li>
</ul>
Limited platform support
Engage AI focuses exclusively on LinkedIn. If you also engage on Twitter, Reddit, or other platforms, you need separate tools.
What users want from an Engage AI alternative:
<ul>
<li>Better AI quality that sounds more human</li>
<li>Lower pricing (especially for solo users)</li>
<li>Multi-platform support</li>
<li>Better voice adaptation</li>
<li>More customization options</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Top 5 Engage AI Alternatives</h2>
<h3>#1 LigoAI - Best AI Quality &amp; Multi-Platform Support</h3>
What it is: Chrome extension providing AI-generated comments across LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook.
vs Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>AI Quality: LigoAI uses GPT-4-class models; more contextually aware</li>
<li>Pricing: Free trial (30 comments) vs Engage AI’s $19+ monthly</li>
<li>Platforms: Multi-platform vs LinkedIn-only</li>
<li>Voice Learning: Adapts during 30-comment trial</li>
</ul>
Key features:
<ul>
<li>Context-aware comment generation</li>
<li>Voice learning and adaptation</li>
<li>Manual trigger (you approve every comment)</li>
<li>Works across 4 platforms</li>
<li>No LinkedIn ban risk</li>
</ul>
Pricing: Free trial (30 comments), then paid plans
Best for: Professionals who want premium AI quality, multi-platform support, and ability to test before committing.
Pros:
<ul>
<li>Better AI quality than Engage AI</li>
<li>Free trial to test voice adaptation</li>
<li>Multi-platform (LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook)</li>
<li>Simpler interface</li>
<li>Lower ban risk (manual approval)</li>
</ul>
Cons:
<ul>
<li>No CRM/lead tracking features</li>
<li>Free trial limited to 30 comments</li>
<li>No team features</li>
</ul>
<a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof">Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)</a>
Direct comparison: If you use Engage AI primarily for comment generation (not CRM features), LigoAI delivers better AI at better value.
<hr>
<h3>#2 ChatGPT + Manual Workflow - Best Free Alternative</h3>
What it is: Using ChatGPT to generate comment suggestions, then manually posting on LinkedIn.
vs Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>Cost: Free (GPT-3.5) or $20/month (GPT-4) vs $19-99/month</li>
<li>AI Quality: GPT-4 exceeds Engage AI’s quality</li>
<li>Workflow: Manual copy-paste vs integrated extension</li>
</ul>
How it works:
<ol>
<li>Copy LinkedIn post text</li>
<li>Paste into ChatGPT with prompt</li>
<li>Review and customize suggestion</li>
<li>Paste into LinkedIn and post</li>
</ol>
Pricing: Free (GPT-3.5) or $20/month (ChatGPT Plus)
Best for: Budget-conscious users who don’t mind manual workflows.
Pros:
<ul>
<li>Cheapest option (potentially free)</li>
<li>Best AI quality (GPT-4)</li>
<li>Maximum customization</li>
<li>Works for all platforms</li>
</ul>
Cons:
<ul>
<li>Manual copy-paste is tedious</li>
<li>No LinkedIn integration</li>
<li>Slower than browser extensions</li>
<li>No voice learning</li>
</ul>
Verdict: Best free option, but workflow friction makes it impractical for high-volume commenting (15+ daily).
<hr>
<h3>#3 Taplio Comment Generator - Best All-in-One Platform</h3>
What it is: Comment generation as part of Taplio’s comprehensive LinkedIn platform.
vs Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>Features: All-in-one (scheduling, analytics, CRM) vs comment-focused</li>
<li>Pricing: $39-199/month vs $19-99/month</li>
<li>Use Case: Full platform vs specialized tool</li>
</ul>
Taplio includes:
<ul>
<li>AI comment generator</li>
<li>Post scheduling</li>
<li>Content library</li>
<li>Analytics dashboard</li>
<li>Carousel maker</li>
<li>LinkedIn CRM</li>
</ul>
Pricing: $39-199/month
Best for: Users who need multiple LinkedIn tools and will use 5+ features regularly.
Pros:
<ul>
<li>Comprehensive feature set</li>
<li>Good if you use multiple tools</li>
<li>Team collaboration features</li>
<li>Unified platform</li>
</ul>
Cons:
<ul>
<li>Expensive if you only need comments</li>
<li>Feature overwhelm</li>
<li>Steep learning curve</li>
<li>Overkill for focused use cases</li>
</ul>
Verdict: Choose Taplio over Engage AI only if you’ll actually use scheduling, analytics, and content creation features. Otherwise, it’s expensive overkill.
<hr>
<h3>#4 Dux-Soup - Best for Sales-Focused Automation</h3>
What it is: LinkedIn automation tool including profile visits, connection requests, messaging, and commenting.
vs Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>Focus: Sales automation vs engagement</li>
<li>Automation Level: More aggressive vs conservative</li>
<li>Risk: Higher ban risk vs lower risk</li>
</ul>
Key features:
<ul>
<li>Automated profile visits</li>
<li>Connection request campaigns</li>
<li>Message sequences</li>
<li>Auto-commenting (template-based)</li>
<li>CRM integration</li>
</ul>
Pricing: $14.99-55/month
Best for: B2B sales professionals who want outreach automation beyond just commenting.
Important warning: Higher LinkedIn ban risk than Engage AI or LigoAI due to more aggressive automation.
Pros:
<ul>
<li>Cheaper than Engage AI</li>
<li>More features (connection requests, messages)</li>
<li>Good for sales workflows</li>
<li>CRM integration</li>
</ul>
Cons:
<ul>
<li>Higher ban risk</li>
<li>Comments are template-based (not AI-generated)</li>
<li>Steeper learning curve</li>
<li>Not ideal for personal brand building</li>
</ul>
Verdict: Choose Dux-Soup if you need full sales automation. Avoid if you only want comment assistance—it’s riskier and comments are lower quality.
<hr>
<h3>#5 DIY: Custom GPT + Browser Automation</h3>
What it is: Building your own comment tool using ChatGPT API and basic automation scripts.
vs Engage AI:
<ul>
<li>Cost: Pay-per-use (~$0.02-0.05/comment) vs $19-99/month flat fee</li>
<li>Customization: Unlimited vs pre-built features</li>
<li>Effort: High setup vs plug-and-play</li>
</ul>
How it works:
<ol>
<li>Use ChatGPT API for comment generation</li>
<li>Build simple Chrome extension or bookmarklet</li>
<li>Automate parts of workflow (optional)</li>
</ol>
Pricing: ChatGPT API costs ~$0.02-0.05 per comment (volume dependent)
Best for: Technical users who want maximum control and minimum cost at scale.
Pros:
<ul>
<li>Cheapest at high volume</li>
<li>Complete customization</li>
<li>Best AI quality (GPT-4 API)</li>
<li>Learning experience</li>
</ul>
Cons:
<ul>
<li>Requires technical skills</li>
<li>Time investment to build</li>
<li>Maintenance burden</li>
<li>No support</li>
</ul>
Verdict: Only pursue if you enjoy building tools. For 99% of users, pre-built solutions (LigoAI, ChatGPT manual) save time and frustration.
<hr>
<h2>Feature Comparison Table</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Feature</th>
<th>LigoAI</th>
<th>ChatGPT Manual</th>
<th>Taplio</th>
<th>Dux-Soup</th>
<th>DIY</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Price</td>
<td>Free trial + paid</td>
<td>Free-$20/mo</td>
<td>$39-199/mo</td>
<td>$15-55/mo</td>
<td>API costs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AI Quality</td>
<td>Excellent</td>
<td>Excellent</td>
<td>Good</td>
<td>Template-only</td>
<td>Excellent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LinkedIn Integration</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>Custom</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Multi-Platform</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>Custom</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Voice Learning</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>Limited</td>
<td>Limited</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>Custom</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Setup Time</td>
<td>2 min</td>
<td>0 min</td>
<td>30 min</td>
<td>15 min</td>
<td>Hours</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ban Risk</td>
<td>Very Low</td>
<td>None</td>
<td>Low</td>
<td>Medium-High</td>
<td>Low</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CRM Features</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>Custom</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Best For</td>
<td>AI quality seekers</td>
<td>Budget users</td>
<td>All-in-one</td>
<td>Sales automation</td>
<td>Developers</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
vs Engage AI comparison:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Feature</th>
<th>LigoAI</th>
<th>Engage AI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Price</td>
<td>Free trial + paid</td>
<td>$19-99/mo</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AI Quality</td>
<td>Excellent (GPT-4-class)</td>
<td>Good</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Platforms</td>
<td>4 platforms</td>
<td>LinkedIn only</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Voice Adaptation</td>
<td>Strong</td>
<td>Moderate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CRM/Lead Tracking</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>✅</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Free Trial</td>
<td>30 comments</td>
<td>Limited</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ban Risk</td>
<td>Very Low</td>
<td>Low</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>How to Choose the Right Engage AI Alternative</h2>
Choose LigoAI if:
✓ AI quality is your top priority
✓ You want multi-platform support (Twitter, Reddit, Facebook)
✓ You want to test with a meaningful free trial
✓ You don’t need CRM/lead tracking features
✓ You prefer simple, focused tools
Choose ChatGPT Manual if:
✓ Budget is your primary concern
✓ You’re comfortable with manual workflows
✓ You comment 5-10 times daily (low volume)
✓ You want the best AI quality regardless of convenience
Choose Taplio if:
✓ You need full LinkedIn platform (scheduling, analytics, carousels)
✓ You’ll use 5+ features regularly
✓ Budget isn’t a constraint ($39-199/month is acceptable)
✓ You prefer all-in-one solutions
Choose Dux-Soup if:
✓ You need sales automation (connection requests, messages)
✓ Comment quality is secondary to volume
✓ You’re comfortable with higher ban risk
✓ You run active B2B outreach campaigns
Stay with Engage AI if:
✓ You heavily use the CRM/lead tracking features
✓ You’re satisfied with current AI quality
✓ You’re already in their ecosystem
<hr>
<h2>Migration Guide: Switching from Engage AI</h2>
Step 1: Identify what you actually use
Review your Engage AI usage:
<ul>
<li>Do you use lead tracking features? (If yes, consider Taplio or Dux-Soup)</li>
<li>Do you only use comment generation? (If yes, LigoAI or ChatGPT)</li>
<li>How many comments daily? (High volume = LigoAI, Low volume = ChatGPT)</li>
</ul>
Step 2: Test alternatives with free trials
Week 1: Try LigoAI’s 30-comment free trial
<ul>
<li>Compare AI quality to Engage AI</li>
<li>Test voice adaptation</li>
<li>Measure engagement results</li>
</ul>
Week 2: Try ChatGPT manual workflow (if budget-focused)
<ul>
<li>Test with 5-10 comments</li>
<li>Evaluate if manual workflow is acceptable</li>
</ul>
Step 3: Compare results
Metrics to track:
<ul>
<li>Comment quality (your subjective assessment)</li>
<li>Reply rate on your comments</li>
<li>Time per comment</li>
<li>Profile visits generated</li>
<li>Overall satisfaction</li>
</ul>
Step 4: Make the switch
If alternative meets needs:
<ul>
<li>Cancel Engage AI before next billing cycle</li>
<li>Export any data you need (prospect lists, etc.)</li>
<li>Migrate to new tool</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Real User Switching Stories</h2>
Case Study: Solo consultant switched to LigoAI
David paid $39/month for Engage AI. Primary use: commenting on prospects’ posts.
He switched to LigoAI because:
<ul>
<li>Better AI quality (“sounds more like me”)</li>
<li>Also uses Twitter for engagement (LigoAI works there too)</li>
<li>Free trial let him test thoroughly</li>
</ul>
Result: Saved $468/year, better AI quality, same engagement results.
Case Study: Sales team stayed with Engage AI
Marketing agency with 5 SDRs. Used Engage AI’s lead tracking features heavily.
They evaluated LigoAI but stayed with Engage AI because:
<ul>
<li>Needed prospect tracking</li>
<li>Team features were valuable</li>
<li>Already integrated into workflow</li>
</ul>
Key learning: If you use Engage AI’s CRM features, alternatives may not fully replace it.
<hr>
<h2>Pricing Comparison: 1-Year Cost</h2>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Tool</th>
<th>Annual Cost</th>
<th>What You Get</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Engage AI Basic</td>
<td>$228/year</td>
<td>Comment AI + basic features</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Engage AI Pro</td>
<td>$468/year</td>
<td>Comment AI + lead tracking</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LigoAI</td>
<td>Free trial + paid</td>
<td>Comment AI + multi-platform</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ChatGPT Plus</td>
<td>$240/year</td>
<td>Manual workflow, best AI</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taplio</td>
<td>$468-2,388/year</td>
<td>Full LinkedIn platform</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dux-Soup</td>
<td>$180-660/year</td>
<td>Sales automation</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Savings potential: Switching from Engage AI ($468/year) to LigoAI or ChatGPT can save $228-468 annually while maintaining or improving AI quality.
<hr>
<h2>Start Testing Engage AI Alternatives Today</h2>
The best way to find your ideal LinkedIn comment tool is hands-on testing.
Recommended approach:
<ol>
<li>Try LigoAI’s free trial (30 comments) - Test premium AI quality risk-free</li>
<li>Try ChatGPT manual workflow - See if free option works for your volume</li>
<li>Compare to current Engage AI experience - Is AI better? Worse? Same?</li>
<li>Decide based on data, not assumptions</li>
</ol>
Most users discover they either:
<ul>
<li>Get better AI quality with LigoAI</li>
<li>Save money with ChatGPT (if low volume)</li>
<li>Actually need Engage AI’s CRM features (stay)</li>
</ul>
<a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof">Start with LigoAI Free Trial (30 Comments)</a>
<hr>
<h2>Final Verdict: Is Engage AI Still Worth It?</h2>
Engage AI is worth keeping if:
<ul>
<li>You use lead tracking/CRM features regularly</li>
<li>You’re satisfied with AI quality</li>
<li>$19-99/month fits your budget</li>
<li>You’re deeply integrated</li>
</ul>
Switch to an alternative if:
<ul>
<li>You only use comment generation (don’t need CRM)</li>
<li>AI quality doesn’t match your voice</li>
<li>You want multi-platform support</li>
<li>Budget is a concern</li>
</ul>
The LinkedIn comment tool landscape is competitive. You no longer have to choose between “expensive mediocre tool” or “no tool at all.” Better AI quality and better pricing exist—if you’re willing to test alternatives.
<hr>
<h2>Related Resources</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/automate-linkedin-comments-5-tools-save-time-2025">Automate LinkedIn Comments: 5 Tools to Save Time in 2025</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-comment-generator-tools-compared-free-vs-paid-2025">LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools Compared: Free vs Paid (2025)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/taplio-alternatives-7-better-linkedin-tools-2025">Taplio Alternatives: 7 Better LinkedIn Tools in 2025</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/best-linkedin-automation-tools-wont-get-banned-2025">Best LinkedIn Automation Tools That Won’t Get You Banned (2025)</a></li>
</ul>

Looking for Engage AI alternatives? Compare 5 LinkedIn comment tools with better pricing, features, and AI quality. Find your perfect match.

Engage AI Alternatives: 5 Better LinkedIn Comment Tools (2025)

Engage AI Alternatives: Best LinkedIn Comment Tools in 2025

Discover how to automate LinkedIn comments ethically with AI tools. Compare top automation platforms, pricing, and best practices for engagement.

Posts tagged: AI Comments

LigoAI vs Engage AI: Comment Tool Showdown (2025)

Free LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools (2025)

Engage AI Alternatives: Best LinkedIn Comment Tools in 2025

Automate LinkedIn Comments: 5 Tools to Save Time in 2025