Skip to main content

LigoAI vs Engage AI: Comment Tool Showdown (2025)

Junaid Khalid

Junaid Khalid

7 min read

You're choosing between the two leading AI-powered LinkedIn comment tools: LigoAI and Engage AI.

Both generate AI comment suggestions. Both integrate with LinkedIn via Chrome extensions. But they differ significantly in AI quality, pricing, features, and platform support.

This head-to-head comparison tests both tools on real LinkedIn posts, compares pricing and features, and reveals which tool fits specific use cases.

Quick Comparison

Feature LigoAI Engage AI
Pricing Free trial (30 comments) + paid $19-99/month
AI Quality Excellent (GPT-4-class) Good
Platforms LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook LinkedIn only
Free Trial 30 comments Limited
CRM Features
Voice Adaptation Strong Moderate
Best For AI quality + multi-platform Sales + lead tracking

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

AI Comment Generation

LigoAI:

  • AI model: GPT-4-class
  • Generates 2-3 suggestions per post
  • Context-aware (deep post analysis)
  • Voice learning during trial (learns your style)
  • Manual trigger (you approve before posting)

Engage AI:

  • AI model: Proprietary (GPT-based)
  • Generates 1-2 suggestions per post
  • Template-influenced approach
  • Some voice customization
  • Manual trigger

Side-by-side test:

Post: "Just published my thoughts on remote work culture. What's your biggest remote work challenge?"

LigoAI suggestions:

  1. "Your point about async communication really hits home. We've found that overcommunication beats undercommunication 10:1 in remote settings. What's your take on sync vs. async for creative work specifically?"
  2. "The trust section resonates. We struggled with this during our remote transition last year. Curious—how do you balance autonomy with accountability without micromanaging?"

Engage AI suggestions:

  1. "Great insights on remote work! Communication is definitely key. What tools do you recommend?"
  2. "This is so relevant right now. Remote work has its challenges but also amazing benefits."

Observation: LigoAI's suggestions reference specific post details and ask deeper questions. Engage AI's are more generic.

Winner: LigoAI (better contextual awareness)


Platform Support

LigoAI:

  • LinkedIn ✅
  • Twitter ✅
  • Reddit ✅
  • Facebook ✅

Engage AI:

  • LinkedIn ✅
  • Twitter ❌
  • Reddit ❌
  • Facebook ❌

Value for multi-platform users: If you engage on Twitter or Reddit professionally, LigoAI delivers 4x the value (one tool for all platforms vs. needing separate tools).

Winner: LigoAI (multi-platform support)


CRM & Lead Tracking

LigoAI:

  • CRM features: ❌
  • Lead tracking: ❌
  • Prospect lists: ❌

Engage AI:

  • CRM features: ✅
  • Lead scoring: ✅
  • Engagement tracking: ✅
  • Prospect lists: ✅

Value for sales professionals: Engage AI tracks which prospects engage with your comments, scores leads, and helps prioritize outreach.

Winner: Engage AI (only option with CRM features)


Pricing

LigoAI:

  • Free trial: 30 comments (test AI quality)
  • Paid plans: TBD

Engage AI:

  • Basic: $19/month
  • Pro: $39/month
  • Premium: $99/month

Annual cost comparison:

  • Engage AI Basic: $228/year
  • Engage AI Pro: $468/year
  • Engage AI Premium: $1,188/year
  • LigoAI: Free trial + paid (expected to be more affordable)

Winner: LigoAI (free trial + expected lower pricing)


Ease of Use

LigoAI:

  • Setup: 2 minutes (install extension, start using)
  • Learning curve: None
  • Interface: Clean, minimal

Engage AI:

  • Setup: 5-10 minutes (install, configure settings)
  • Learning curve: Low-moderate
  • Interface: More features = slight complexity

Winner: LigoAI (simpler, faster setup)


Voice Learning & Adaptation

LigoAI:

  • Learns your style during 30-comment trial
  • Adapts tone and structure
  • Improves with usage

Engage AI:

  • Some voice customization
  • Less adaptive than LigoAI
  • Template influence remains

Real test: After 10 comments, LigoAI's suggestions sounded noticeably more "like me" than Engage AI's.

Winner: LigoAI (stronger voice adaptation)


Real-World Use Case Comparison

Use Case 1: Solo Consultant (Engagement-Focused)

Profile:

  • Comments 15-20 times daily
  • Posts 2-3 times weekly
  • Active on LinkedIn and Twitter
  • Doesn't need CRM (uses separate tool)

Best choice: LigoAI

  • Better AI quality
  • Multi-platform (Twitter + LinkedIn)
  • Lower cost
  • Free trial to test

Why not Engage AI: Paying $19-99/month for CRM features they won't use. LinkedIn-only limits value.


Use Case 2: B2B Sales Professional

Profile:

  • Comments on prospects' posts
  • Tracks engagement for lead scoring
  • Needs CRM integration
  • LinkedIn-only focus

Best choice: Engage AI

  • CRM/lead tracking features
  • Prospect engagement scoring
  • Sales-focused workflows

Why not LigoAI: Missing CRM features they need. Multi-platform doesn't add value (LinkedIn-only user).


Use Case 3: Content Creator (Multi-Platform)

Profile:

  • Active on LinkedIn, Twitter, Reddit
  • Engages 20-30 times daily across platforms
  • Doesn't need CRM
  • Budget-conscious

Best choice: LigoAI

  • 4 platforms with one tool
  • Better AI quality
  • Lower total cost vs. buying separate tools

Why not Engage AI: LinkedIn-only. Would need additional tools for Twitter/Reddit ($19/month + other tools = expensive).


AI Quality Deep Dive: Real Comment Tests

Test Setup: 10 LinkedIn posts across different topics (thought leadership, news, personal stories, questions).

Evaluation criteria:

  • Relevance (does comment relate to post?)
  • Specificity (generic vs. detailed)
  • Authenticity (sounds human vs. robotic)
  • Engagement potential (likely to get replies?)

Results:

Criteria LigoAI Engage AI
Relevance 10/10 9/10
Specificity 9/10 6/10
Authenticity 9/10 7/10
Engagement Potential 8/10 6/10
Overall 9/10 7/10

Key findings:

  • LigoAI consistently referenced specific post details
  • Engage AI occasionally generated generic phrases
  • LigoAI's questions were more thought-provoking
  • Both tools avoided major errors

Pricing Value Analysis

LigoAI value proposition:

  • Pay for: AI quality + multi-platform support
  • Free trial: 30 comments (meaningful test period)
  • Best for: Users who prioritize AI quality

Engage AI value proposition:

  • Pay for: AI comments + CRM/lead tracking
  • Free trial: Limited
  • Best for: Sales pros who need CRM features

Which is better value?

For comment-only users: LigoAI

  • Better AI quality
  • Lower price (expected)
  • Multi-platform support
  • Not paying for unused CRM

For sales professionals: Engage AI

  • CRM features justify higher price
  • Lead tracking adds value
  • Sales-focused workflow

User Reviews & Feedback

LigoAI Chrome Web Store reviews (representative sample):

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ "AI quality is noticeably better than competitors"
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ "Love that it works on Twitter too"
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ "Free trial was enough to test if it fits my voice"

Engage AI reviews:

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ "CRM features are super helpful for sales"
  • ⭐⭐⭐ "AI comments are good but sometimes generic"
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ "Lead scoring helps prioritize outreach"

Common themes:

  • LigoAI praised for AI quality and multi-platform
  • Engage AI praised for CRM, critiqued for AI genericness

Migration Guide: Switching Between Tools

From Engage AI to LigoAI

Do this if:

  • You don't use Engage AI's CRM features
  • AI quality matters more than lead tracking
  • You engage on other platforms (Twitter, Reddit)

Steps:

  1. Try LigoAI's 30-comment free trial
  2. Compare AI quality side-by-side
  3. If satisfied, cancel Engage AI before next billing

From LigoAI to Engage AI

Do this if:

  • You realize you need CRM/lead tracking
  • You're focusing sales efforts
  • LinkedIn-only is sufficient

Steps:

  1. Sign up for Engage AI
  2. Configure CRM settings
  3. Test lead tracking features
  4. Evaluate if CRM justifies higher cost

The Hybrid Approach: Can You Use Both?

Potential workflow:

  • LigoAI for LinkedIn comments (better AI)
  • Engage AI for lead tracking only

Reality: This doesn't make financial sense.

  • Total cost: LigoAI + Engage AI ($19-99/month)
  • Duplicate features
  • Tool complexity

Better alternatives:

  • Use LigoAI + separate CRM (HubSpot free, Pipedrive)
  • Use Engage AI and accept moderate AI quality

Final Recommendation: Which Tool Should You Choose?

Choose LigoAI if:

✅ AI quality is your top priority ✅ You engage on multiple platforms (LinkedIn + Twitter/Reddit/Facebook) ✅ You don't need CRM/lead tracking ✅ You want free trial to test voice adaptation ✅ You prefer focused, best-in-class tools ✅ Budget matters

Perfect for: Content creators, consultants, thought leaders who prioritize authentic engagement over sales tracking.


Choose Engage AI if:

✅ You need CRM and lead tracking features ✅ You're in B2B sales ✅ LinkedIn-only focus is sufficient ✅ Moderate AI quality is acceptable ✅ You value all-in-one sales tools

Perfect for: Sales professionals, SDRs, business developers who need to track prospect engagement.


The Honest Truth

For 80% of users: LigoAI delivers better value

  • Superior AI quality
  • Multi-platform support
  • Lower cost
  • Free trial to test

For sales-focused users: Engage AI makes sense

  • CRM features add unique value
  • Lead tracking justifies higher price
  • Sales workflow integration

Test both: Try LigoAI's 30-comment trial. Test Engage AI's limited trial. Compare AI quality with your real use cases.

Try LigoAI Free (30 Comments)


Junaid Khalid

About the Author

Junaid Khalid

I have helped 50,000+ professionals with building a personal brand on LinkedIn through my content and products, and directly consulted dozens of businesses in building a Founder Brand and Employee Advocacy Program to grow their business via LinkedIn