Compare the best LinkedIn comment generator tools. AI-powered platforms, free trials, features, and pricing to boost your engagement effortlessly.

Best LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools: Free vs Paid (2025)

LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools Compared: Free vs Paid (2025)


You leave thoughtful comments on LinkedIn posts. You spend time crafting responses. Yet you rarely get replies, your comments get buried, and you wonder if anyone even reads them.

The problem is not your effort. The problem is your approach. Most LinkedIn comments follow predictable patterns that blend into the noise. The posts with dozens of engaged replies use a specific formula that makes people want to respond.

After analyzing thousands of high-performing comments across 50,000+ LiGo users and testing different approaches on my own profile, I've identified the exact formula that consistently generates replies and starts meaningful conversations.

Here's the proven 7-step formula for writing LinkedIn comments that actually get replies in 2025.

## Why Most LinkedIn Comments Get Ignored

Before the formula, understand what doesn't work.

**Generic praise comments**: "Great post!" or "Thanks for sharing!" add zero value. They signal you didn't actually read or think about the content.

**Self-promotional comments**: Immediately pitching your product or service in someone else's post is the fastest way to get ignored or blocked.

**One-word reactions**: "Agreed." or "This." might feel supportive, but they don't invite conversation.

**Copycat comments**: Repeating what others already said without adding a new angle shows you didn't read the existing discussion.

**Essay-length monologues**: Comments that are longer than the original post overwhelm readers. People scroll past walls of text.

**What actually works**: Comments that add specific value, invite response, and show genuine engagement with the content and community.

## The 7-Step Formula for Reply-Generating Comments

This formula works across different post types, industries, and audiences. Adapt the specifics to your voice, but follow the structure.

### Step 1: Read the Full Post (and Existing Comments)

**Seems obvious but most skip this**. Skim-reading the first paragraph and jumping to comment leads to awkward responses that miss the point.

**What to do**:
- Read entire post thoroughly
- Scan existing comments to avoid repeating points
- Notice what the author emphasized or questioned

**Why this matters**: Your comment quality reveals whether you engaged with the content. Authors notice and appreciate thoughtful engagement.

**Time investment**: 30-60 seconds of reading saves you from looking foolish and multiplies impact.

### Step 2: Find Your Specific Hook

**Don't comment on everything you agree with**. Pick ONE specific point that genuinely resonates, surprises, or challenges you.

**Types of hooks that work**:

**Personal experience alignment**: "Your point about [X] matches exactly what happened when I [specific situation]"

**Contrarian angle**: "Interesting take. I've actually found [different result] when [specific context]"

**Expanding on underexplored point**: "The part about [X] deserves more attention because [reason]"

**Question from expert blindspot**: "This makes sense for [audience A]. How would you adapt this for [audience B]?"

**The test**: If your hook could apply to any post on any topic, it's too generic. Make it specific to THIS post.

### Step 3: Open with a Strong First Sentence

Your first sentence determines if people read the rest.

**Proven opening patterns**:

**Immediate value-add**: "I tested this exact approach for 6 months and here's what I learned..."

**Respectful disagreement**: "Interesting perspective. My experience has been different..."

**Specific affirmation**: "Your point about [specific detail] is spot-on, especially for [specific industry/situation]"

**Insightful question**: "This raises an interesting question about [specific related topic]"

**Story hook**: "This reminds me of when [specific situation with surprising outcome]"

**What NOT to open with**: "Great post!", "I agree!", "Thanks for sharing", or any generic phrase.

**Example comparison**:

Bad: "Great post! I love this topic."

Good: "Your framework for qualifying leads changed how our team operates."

The good example is specific, signals value, and invites follow-up questions.

### Step 4: Add Specific Value (Evidence, Story, or Insight)

**This is the core of reply-generating comments**. After your hook and opening, add something that wasn't in the original post.

**Three value-add approaches**:

**1. Personal evidence**: Share specific results from your experience that validate or challenge the post

Example: "When we implemented this at [Company], our response rate went from 12% to 34% in 8 weeks. The key difference was [specific tactic]."

**2. Contextual story**: Brief narrative showing the concept in action

Example: "I saw this play out last month with a client. They were doing [old approach], switched to [new approach], and within 30 days [specific result]. The turning point was [insight]."

**3. Extended insight**: Add nuance, framework, or perspective not in the original post

Example: "Your point about timing applies especially to B2B SaaS where buying cycles extend 6-9 months. The pattern I've noticed: [specific pattern with explanation]."

**Length guideline**: 2-4 sentences in this section. Enough to add value, not so long people skip it.

### Step 5: End with a Specific Question

**This is what transforms a comment into a conversation**. Questions invite response. Generic questions get ignored. Specific questions get answers.

**Effective question types**:

**Choice-based questions**: "Which has worked better in your experience: [Option A] or [Option B]?"

**Context-seeking questions**: "How does this approach change for [specific situation]?"

**Tactical clarification**: "When you say [quoted phrase], are you referring to [interpretation A] or [interpretation B]?"

**Experience inquiry**: "Have you seen this work in [specific industry/context]?"

**Avoid**: "What do you think?" or "Any other tips?" (too generic, requires too much mental effort to answer)

**Example comparison**:

Generic: "Great points! What else would you add?"

Specific: "Do you find this strategy works better for early-stage companies vs. established enterprises, or is it fairly universal?"

The specific question shows thought and makes it easy to provide a focused answer.

### Step 6: Optional Soft Mention

**Use sparingly and only when genuinely relevant**: Tag one person who would add value to the discussion.

**When to tag**:
- Someone whose expertise would enhance the conversation
- Someone directly affected by the topic
- Someone you know has contrasting but valuable perspective

**When NOT to tag**:
- Random influencers hoping they'll notice you
- Multiple people (looks spammy)
- People who have nothing to do with the topic

**How to tag correctly**: "This reminds me of what @[Name] shared about [specific related topic]"

**Most times, skip the tag entirely**. Your comment quality matters more than tagging.

### Step 7: Review and Simplify

Before hitting post, review your comment through these filters:

**Specificity test**: Could this comment apply to any post, or is it specific to this one?

**Value test**: Does this add something not already in the post or comments?

**Brevity test**: Can I cut 20% of words without losing meaning?

**Question test**: Does my question invite a focused response, or is it too vague?

**Tone test**: Does this sound like how I actually talk, or robotic/formal?

**Edit ruthlessly**: Remove fluff, tighten language, ensure clarity.

---

## Putting the Formula Together: Before and After Examples

### Example 1: Business Strategy Post

**Post topic**: How to scale a sales team from 5 to 50 reps

**Bad comment**:
"Great insights! Scaling sales is so important. Thanks for sharing your experience. What other tips do you have?"

Why it fails: Generic, adds no value, vague question

**Good comment using formula**:
"Your point about hiring in cohorts rather than one-by-one is critical. When we scaled from 8 to 35 reps over 18 months, the cohort approach reduced onboarding time by 40% because reps learned together and built internal networks. The challenge we hit: Maintaining culture consistency across cohorts. How did you handle cultural dilution as you scaled?"

Why it works:
- Specific hook (cohort hiring)
- Concrete evidence (40% reduction)
- Added insight (culture challenge)
- Targeted question inviting expertise

### Example 2: Marketing Tactics Post

**Post topic**: Why email marketing still beats social media for ROI

**Bad comment**:
"I agree! Email is definitely not dead. We use email too and it works great."

Why it fails: Vague agreement, no specifics, no invitation for dialogue

**Good comment using formula**:
"The 3:1 ROI comparison you shared matches our data exactly. We tested identical campaigns across email vs. LinkedIn ads last quarter. Email: $3.20 return per $1 spent. LinkedIn: $0.90 per $1. The surprising difference was time-to-conversion: Email averaged 8 days, LinkedIn 23 days. Are you seeing similar timing gaps, or does that vary by industry?"

Why it works:
- Validates with specific data
- Adds new dimension (time-to-conversion)
- Asks focused, answerable question
- Demonstrates genuine testing and analysis

### Example 3: Leadership Post

**Post topic**: Remote leadership requires different skills than in-person

**Bad comment**:
"So true! Remote work changed everything. Leaders need to adapt or they'll struggle."

Why it fails: Restates obvious, adds nothing new

**Good comment using formula**:
"Your point about asynchronous communication is what most new remote leaders miss. I've watched three directors struggle with this transition. The pattern: They kept treating remote like in-office but via Zoom (synchronous mindset). The ones who succeeded shifted to written updates, recorded videos, and documented decisions (async mindset). The productivity difference was dramatic. What frameworks have you found most helpful for teaching this shift to traditional managers?"

Why it works:
- Identifies specific insight from post
- Shares observed pattern with context
- Provides framework (sync vs. async)
- Asks for practical tools/frameworks

---

## Advanced Commenting Tactics

Once you master the basic formula, these advanced tactics multiply effectiveness:

### Timing Optimization

**Comment within first 60 minutes of post going live**: Early comments get more visibility as later viewers engage with the post.

**How to catch posts early**: Turn on notifications for key creators, check LinkedIn 2-3 times daily during peak hours.

**The early commenter advantage**: Your comment sits near the top as post gains traction. More views, more profile visits, more connection requests.

### The Follow-Up Reply

**Don't ghost after commenting**: When the author or others reply to your comment, respond within 24 hours.

**Keep conversation going**: Ask follow-up question, share additional insight, acknowledge their response.

**Why this matters**: Comment threads with back-and-forth signal to LinkedIn that discussion is valuable, boosting post visibility. You benefit from continued exposure.

### Strategic Creator Selection

**Don't comment randomly**: Identify 20-30 creators whose audiences match your ideal connections.

**Prioritize posts where your expertise adds value**: Better to leave 3 exceptional comments than 20 mediocre ones.

**Build pattern recognition**: Consistent valuable commenting makes creators and their audiences recognize you as knowledgeable in your domain.

### The "Value First, Promote Later" Approach

**Establish yourself through pure value for 2-3 months** before any self-promotion.

**Then occasionally (1 in 20 comments)**: "This reminds me of [similar challenge]. We addressed it by [approach] which led to [result]. Wrote about the full process here: [link to your content]"

**The credibility you built through value-first commenting makes occasional promotion welcome instead of spammy**.

---

## Tools to Implement This Formula Efficiently

**Manual commenting at this quality level takes time**. Here's how to maintain quality while improving efficiency:

**LiGo Chrome Extension**: Helps you generate thoughtful, authentic comments following this exact formula. Works across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, and Meta. Free version covers core functionality.

The extension analyzes the post content and generates customized comments that:
- Reference specific details from the post
- Match your authentic voice
- Include thoughtful questions
- Save 60-70% of commenting time

[Try LiGo Free](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof)

**Comment tracking system**: Simple spreadsheet or note to track which posts you commented on, who engaged with your comments, and which approaches generated best results.

**Voice guidelines document**: 5-10 sentences describing your commenting style, areas of expertise, and tone preferences. Reference this to maintain consistency.

---

## Measuring Comment Success

Track these metrics to refine your approach:

**Reply rate**: What percentage of your comments get responses from post author or other commenters?

**Profile views from comments**: LinkedIn shows referral source. Track profile visits after commenting.

**Connection requests**: Quality comments generate connection requests from people who see you in discussions.

**Engagement on your comments**: Likes and replies to your comments indicate value.

**Conversation depth**: Do your comments spark multi-person discussions?

**Target benchmarks** (after 30 days of consistent quality commenting):
- 30-40% of comments should get replies
- 5-10 profile views per thoughtful comment
- 2-5 connection requests weekly from commenting activity

**If you're below these targets**: Review your comments against the 7-step formula. Most commonly, comments lack specificity or ask poor questions.

---

This formula works because it treats commenting as relationship building, not transaction chasing. You add value first, demonstrate expertise through specificity, and invite genuine dialogue.

Start applying this 7-step formula today. Pick one post from your feed right now and craft a comment following these steps. Notice the quality difference immediately.

Within 2-3 weeks of consistent implementation, you'll see measurably higher reply rates, stronger network growth, and better opportunities from LinkedIn engagement.

---

## Related Resources

-   [How to Comment on LinkedIn Posts to Build Your Network](https://ligoai.com/blog/how-to-comment-linkedin-posts-build-network)
-   [LinkedIn Commenting Schedule: When to Comment for Maximum Reach](https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-commenting-schedule-maximum-reach)
-   [10 Worst LinkedIn Comment Mistakes (And How to Fix Them)](https://ligoai.com/blog/10-worst-linkedin-comment-mistakes-fix-them)
-   [LinkedIn Algorithm 2025: How Comments Impact Your Reach (Data Study)](https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-algorithm-2025-comments-impact-reach-study)
-   [15 LinkedIn Engagement Hacks That Actually Work in 2025](https://ligoai.com/blog/15-linkedin-engagement-hacks-work-2025)


You leave thoughtful comments on LinkedIn posts. You spend time crafting responses. Yet you rarely get replies, your comments get buried, and you wonder if anyone even reads them.
The problem is not your effort. The problem is your approach. Most LinkedIn comments follow predictable patterns that blend into the noise. The posts with dozens of engaged replies use a specific formula that makes people want to respond.
After analyzing thousands of high-performing comments across 50,000+ LiGo users and testing different approaches on my own profile, I’ve identified the exact formula that consistently generates replies and starts meaningful conversations.
Here’s the proven 7-step formula for writing LinkedIn comments that actually get replies in 2025.
<h2>Why Most LinkedIn Comments Get Ignored</h2>
Before the formula, understand what doesn’t work.
Generic praise comments: “Great post!” or “Thanks for sharing!” add zero value. They signal you didn’t actually read or think about the content.
Self-promotional comments: Immediately pitching your product or service in someone else’s post is the fastest way to get ignored or blocked.
One-word reactions: “Agreed.” or “This.” might feel supportive, but they don’t invite conversation.
Copycat comments: Repeating what others already said without adding a new angle shows you didn’t read the existing discussion.
Essay-length monologues: Comments that are longer than the original post overwhelm readers. People scroll past walls of text.
What actually works: Comments that add specific value, invite response, and show genuine engagement with the content and community.
<h2>The 7-Step Formula for Reply-Generating Comments</h2>
This formula works across different post types, industries, and audiences. Adapt the specifics to your voice, but follow the structure.
<h3>Step 1: Read the Full Post (and Existing Comments)</h3>
Seems obvious but most skip this. Skim-reading the first paragraph and jumping to comment leads to awkward responses that miss the point.
What to do:
<ul>
<li>Read entire post thoroughly</li>
<li>Scan existing comments to avoid repeating points</li>
<li>Notice what the author emphasized or questioned</li>
</ul>
Why this matters: Your comment quality reveals whether you engaged with the content. Authors notice and appreciate thoughtful engagement.
Time investment: 30-60 seconds of reading saves you from looking foolish and multiplies impact.
<h3>Step 2: Find Your Specific Hook</h3>
Don’t comment on everything you agree with. Pick ONE specific point that genuinely resonates, surprises, or challenges you.
Types of hooks that work:
Personal experience alignment: “Your point about [X] matches exactly what happened when I [specific situation]”
Contrarian angle: “Interesting take. I’ve actually found [different result] when [specific context]”
Expanding on underexplored point: “The part about [X] deserves more attention because [reason]”
Question from expert blindspot: “This makes sense for [audience A]. How would you adapt this for [audience B]?”
The test: If your hook could apply to any post on any topic, it’s too generic. Make it specific to THIS post.
<h3>Step 3: Open with a Strong First Sentence</h3>
Your first sentence determines if people read the rest.
Proven opening patterns:
Immediate value-add: “I tested this exact approach for 6 months and here’s what I learned…”
Respectful disagreement: “Interesting perspective. My experience has been different…”
Specific affirmation: “Your point about [specific detail] is spot-on, especially for [specific industry/situation]”
Insightful question: “This raises an interesting question about [specific related topic]”
Story hook: “This reminds me of when [specific situation with surprising outcome]”
What NOT to open with: “Great post!”, “I agree!”, “Thanks for sharing”, or any generic phrase.
Example comparison:
Bad: “Great post! I love this topic.”
Good: “Your framework for qualifying leads changed how our team operates.”
The good example is specific, signals value, and invites follow-up questions.
<h3>Step 4: Add Specific Value (Evidence, Story, or Insight)</h3>
This is the core of reply-generating comments. After your hook and opening, add something that wasn’t in the original post.
Three value-add approaches:
1. Personal evidence: Share specific results from your experience that validate or challenge the post
Example: “When we implemented this at [Company], our response rate went from 12% to 34% in 8 weeks. The key difference was [specific tactic].”
2. Contextual story: Brief narrative showing the concept in action
Example: “I saw this play out last month with a client. They were doing [old approach], switched to [new approach], and within 30 days [specific result]. The turning point was [insight].”
3. Extended insight: Add nuance, framework, or perspective not in the original post
Example: “Your point about timing applies especially to B2B SaaS where buying cycles extend 6-9 months. The pattern I’ve noticed: [specific pattern with explanation].”
Length guideline: 2-4 sentences in this section. Enough to add value, not so long people skip it.
<h3>Step 5: End with a Specific Question</h3>
This is what transforms a comment into a conversation. Questions invite response. Generic questions get ignored. Specific questions get answers.
Effective question types:
Choice-based questions: “Which has worked better in your experience: [Option A] or [Option B]?”
Context-seeking questions: “How does this approach change for [specific situation]?”
Tactical clarification: “When you say [quoted phrase], are you referring to [interpretation A] or [interpretation B]?”
Experience inquiry: “Have you seen this work in [specific industry/context]?”
Avoid: “What do you think?” or “Any other tips?” (too generic, requires too much mental effort to answer)
Example comparison:
Generic: “Great points! What else would you add?”
Specific: “Do you find this strategy works better for early-stage companies vs. established enterprises, or is it fairly universal?”
The specific question shows thought and makes it easy to provide a focused answer.
<h3>Step 6: Optional Soft Mention</h3>
Use sparingly and only when genuinely relevant: Tag one person who would add value to the discussion.
When to tag:
<ul>
<li>Someone whose expertise would enhance the conversation</li>
<li>Someone directly affected by the topic</li>
<li>Someone you know has contrasting but valuable perspective</li>
</ul>
When NOT to tag:
<ul>
<li>Random influencers hoping they’ll notice you</li>
<li>Multiple people (looks spammy)</li>
<li>People who have nothing to do with the topic</li>
</ul>
How to tag correctly: “This reminds me of what @[Name] shared about [specific related topic]”
Most times, skip the tag entirely. Your comment quality matters more than tagging.
<h3>Step 7: Review and Simplify</h3>
Before hitting post, review your comment through these filters:
Specificity test: Could this comment apply to any post, or is it specific to this one?
Value test: Does this add something not already in the post or comments?
Brevity test: Can I cut 20% of words without losing meaning?
Question test: Does my question invite a focused response, or is it too vague?
Tone test: Does this sound like how I actually talk, or robotic/formal?
Edit ruthlessly: Remove fluff, tighten language, ensure clarity.
<hr>
<h2>Putting the Formula Together: Before and After Examples</h2>
<h3>Example 1: Business Strategy Post</h3>
Post topic: How to scale a sales team from 5 to 50 reps
Bad comment:
“Great insights! Scaling sales is so important. Thanks for sharing your experience. What other tips do you have?”
Why it fails: Generic, adds no value, vague question
Good comment using formula:
“Your point about hiring in cohorts rather than one-by-one is critical. When we scaled from 8 to 35 reps over 18 months, the cohort approach reduced onboarding time by 40% because reps learned together and built internal networks. The challenge we hit: Maintaining culture consistency across cohorts. How did you handle cultural dilution as you scaled?”
Why it works:
<ul>
<li>Specific hook (cohort hiring)</li>
<li>Concrete evidence (40% reduction)</li>
<li>Added insight (culture challenge)</li>
<li>Targeted question inviting expertise</li>
</ul>
<h3>Example 2: Marketing Tactics Post</h3>
Post topic: Why email marketing still beats social media for ROI
Bad comment:
“I agree! Email is definitely not dead. We use email too and it works great.”
Why it fails: Vague agreement, no specifics, no invitation for dialogue
Good comment using formula:
“The 3:1 ROI comparison you shared matches our data exactly. We tested identical campaigns across email vs. LinkedIn ads last quarter. Email: $3.20 return per $1 spent. LinkedIn: $0.90 per $1. The surprising difference was time-to-conversion: Email averaged 8 days, LinkedIn 23 days. Are you seeing similar timing gaps, or does that vary by industry?”
Why it works:
<ul>
<li>Validates with specific data</li>
<li>Adds new dimension (time-to-conversion)</li>
<li>Asks focused, answerable question</li>
<li>Demonstrates genuine testing and analysis</li>
</ul>
<h3>Example 3: Leadership Post</h3>
Post topic: Remote leadership requires different skills than in-person
Bad comment:
“So true! Remote work changed everything. Leaders need to adapt or they’ll struggle.”
Why it fails: Restates obvious, adds nothing new
Good comment using formula:
“Your point about asynchronous communication is what most new remote leaders miss. I’ve watched three directors struggle with this transition. The pattern: They kept treating remote like in-office but via Zoom (synchronous mindset). The ones who succeeded shifted to written updates, recorded videos, and documented decisions (async mindset). The productivity difference was dramatic. What frameworks have you found most helpful for teaching this shift to traditional managers?”
Why it works:
<ul>
<li>Identifies specific insight from post</li>
<li>Shares observed pattern with context</li>
<li>Provides framework (sync vs. async)</li>
<li>Asks for practical tools/frameworks</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Advanced Commenting Tactics</h2>
Once you master the basic formula, these advanced tactics multiply effectiveness:
<h3>Timing Optimization</h3>
Comment within first 60 minutes of post going live: Early comments get more visibility as later viewers engage with the post.
How to catch posts early: Turn on notifications for key creators, check LinkedIn 2-3 times daily during peak hours.
The early commenter advantage: Your comment sits near the top as post gains traction. More views, more profile visits, more connection requests.
<h3>The Follow-Up Reply</h3>
Don’t ghost after commenting: When the author or others reply to your comment, respond within 24 hours.
Keep conversation going: Ask follow-up question, share additional insight, acknowledge their response.
Why this matters: Comment threads with back-and-forth signal to LinkedIn that discussion is valuable, boosting post visibility. You benefit from continued exposure.
<h3>Strategic Creator Selection</h3>
Don’t comment randomly: Identify 20-30 creators whose audiences match your ideal connections.
Prioritize posts where your expertise adds value: Better to leave 3 exceptional comments than 20 mediocre ones.
Build pattern recognition: Consistent valuable commenting makes creators and their audiences recognize you as knowledgeable in your domain.
<h3>The “Value First, Promote Later” Approach</h3>
Establish yourself through pure value for 2-3 months before any self-promotion.
Then occasionally (1 in 20 comments): “This reminds me of [similar challenge]. We addressed it by [approach] which led to [result]. Wrote about the full process here: [link to your content]”
The credibility you built through value-first commenting makes occasional promotion welcome instead of spammy.
<hr>
<h2>Tools to Implement This Formula Efficiently</h2>
Manual commenting at this quality level takes time. Here’s how to maintain quality while improving efficiency:
LiGo Chrome Extension: Helps you generate thoughtful, authentic comments following this exact formula. Works across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, and Meta. Free version covers core functionality.
The extension analyzes the post content and generates customized comments that:
<ul>
<li>Reference specific details from the post</li>
<li>Match your authentic voice</li>
<li>Include thoughtful questions</li>
<li>Save 60-70% of commenting time</li>
</ul>
<a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof">Try LiGo Free</a>
Comment tracking system: Simple spreadsheet or note to track which posts you commented on, who engaged with your comments, and which approaches generated best results.
Voice guidelines document: 5-10 sentences describing your commenting style, areas of expertise, and tone preferences. Reference this to maintain consistency.
<hr>
<h2>Measuring Comment Success</h2>
Track these metrics to refine your approach:
Reply rate: What percentage of your comments get responses from post author or other commenters?
Profile views from comments: LinkedIn shows referral source. Track profile visits after commenting.
Connection requests: Quality comments generate connection requests from people who see you in discussions.
Engagement on your comments: Likes and replies to your comments indicate value.
Conversation depth: Do your comments spark multi-person discussions?
Target benchmarks (after 30 days of consistent quality commenting):
<ul>
<li>30-40% of comments should get replies</li>
<li>5-10 profile views per thoughtful comment</li>
<li>2-5 connection requests weekly from commenting activity</li>
</ul>
If you’re below these targets: Review your comments against the 7-step formula. Most commonly, comments lack specificity or ask poor questions.
<hr>
This formula works because it treats commenting as relationship building, not transaction chasing. You add value first, demonstrate expertise through specificity, and invite genuine dialogue.
Start applying this 7-step formula today. Pick one post from your feed right now and craft a comment following these steps. Notice the quality difference immediately.
Within 2-3 weeks of consistent implementation, you’ll see measurably higher reply rates, stronger network growth, and better opportunities from LinkedIn engagement.
<hr>
<h2>Related Resources</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/how-to-comment-linkedin-posts-build-network">How to Comment on LinkedIn Posts to Build Your Network</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-commenting-schedule-maximum-reach">LinkedIn Commenting Schedule: When to Comment for Maximum Reach</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/10-worst-linkedin-comment-mistakes-fix-them">10 Worst LinkedIn Comment Mistakes (And How to Fix Them)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-algorithm-2025-comments-impact-reach-study">LinkedIn Algorithm 2025: How Comments Impact Your Reach (Data Study)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/15-linkedin-engagement-hacks-work-2025">15 LinkedIn Engagement Hacks That Actually Work in 2025</a></li>
</ul>

Master the art of LinkedIn commenting with this proven 7-step formula. Get more replies, build relationships, and grow your professional network.

How to Write LinkedIn Comments That Get Replies (7-Step Formula)

How to Write LinkedIn Comments That Actually Get Replies (2025 Formula)


You post quality content consistently. Your insights are solid. But your engagement numbers stay frustratingly flat while others in your industry seem to effortlessly generate hundreds of reactions and dozens of comments.

The difference isn't better content. The difference is knowing which small tactical choices dramatically impact LinkedIn's algorithm and human behavior.

These 15 engagement hacks are the tested tactics that separate mediocre reach from viral potential. None require fancy tools or big budgets. All deliver measurable results when applied systematically.

## How LinkedIn Engagement Actually Works in 2025

Before the hacks, understand the system you're optimizing for.

**Algorithm basics - The first hour is crucial**: LinkedIn's algorithm tests every post with a small portion of your network in the first 60 minutes. If that test audience engages (especially comments), LinkedIn expands reach. If they don't, your post dies.

**What counts as "engagement"**:

-   Comments (highest weight)
-   Shares (very high weight)
-   Reactions (moderate weight)
-   Clicks on "see more" (meaningful signal)
-   Profile visits from your post (conversion signal)

**Why engagement begets more engagement**: When LinkedIn shows your post to more people, more people engage, which signals LinkedIn to show it to even more people. It's a flywheel. Your job is getting that flywheel spinning in the first hour.

**The compound effect**: One post with 2x typical engagement doesn't just reach 2x people. It often reaches 5-10x people because LinkedIn amplifies what's already working.

---

## Pre-Posting Engagement Hacks

These hacks happen before you even click "Post."

### Hack #1: The "Seed Engagement" Strategy

**What it is**: DM 3-5 connections 10 minutes before posting.

**The message**: "Hey, posting something about [topic] in 10 minutes. Would love your perspective on [specific question]."

**Why it works**: When these people engage in the first few minutes, LinkedIn's algorithm sees early engagement velocity and expands reach.

**Implementation**: Build a "seed engagement" list of 10-15 people who consistently engage with your content. Rotate through them (don't spam the same 3 every time).

### Hack #2: Post When YOUR Audience is Active (Not Generic Best Times)

**Finding YOUR optimal time**: Check LinkedIn analytics to see when your specific audience is online. Generic "best times" don't account for your unique network.

**Testing methodology**: Post at different times for 2 weeks. Track impressions and engagement rate (not just total likes). Find your peak windows.

**Surprise finding**: For many B2B professionals, Saturday mornings outperform Tuesday afternoons because competition is lower.

### Hack #3: The "Document vs Photo" Upload Trick

**What to do**: Upload carousels or PDF documents instead of standard image posts.

**Why it works**: Carousel posts get 3x average engagement because:

-   They keep people on LinkedIn longer (dwell time signal)
-   Multiple slides create natural stopping points
-   The swipe action counts as engagement

**Quick carousel creation**: Use Canva's free LinkedIn carousel templates. 5-7 slides is optimal.

---

## Writing & Formatting Hacks

Small changes to how you write posts create big engagement differences.

### Hack #4: The Double-Line Break Pattern

**What it is**: Add TWO line breaks between every paragraph, not one.

**Why it works**: Mobile optimization. Most LinkedIn readers are on mobile where dense text is harder to read. Extra white space improves scanability by 40%+.

**Visual difference**:

Bad: Paragraph1[one break]Paragraph2
Good: Paragraph1[two breaks]Paragraph2

### Hack #5: Start with "I Almost Didn't Post This"

**The hook**: Begin posts with vulnerability signals like "I almost didn't post this" or "I debated sharing this."

**Psychology**: Creates curiosity + authenticity. Readers want to know what you almost hid.

**When to use**: Personal stories, lessons from failures, contrarian takes.

**Example**: "I almost didn't post this. Admitting I wasted $12K on a failed LinkedIn ads experiment isn't exactly great for my marketing consultant brand. But here's what that expensive lesson taught me..."

### Hack #6: The "Scroll-Stopper" First Line Formula

**5 proven first-line patterns**:

1. **Shocking stat**: "83% of B2B buyers never respond to cold outreach. Here's what works instead."
2. **Bold claim**: "Everything you know about LinkedIn posting times is wrong."
3. **Vulnerable admission**: "I almost quit LinkedIn last year. Here's what changed."
4. **Specific outcome**: "My connection acceptance rate went from 15% to 78% with one change."
5. **Provocative question**: "Why do mediocre LinkedIn posts from CEOs outperform brilliant posts from managers?"

### Hack #7: End with a Polarizing Question

**What NOT to ask**: "What do you think?" (too generic, generates no responses)

**What TO ask**: Questions that force a choice or opinion:

-   "Agree or disagree: [controversial statement]?"
-   "Which matters more: [Option A] or [Option B]?"
-   "What's your biggest challenge: [Challenge 1], [Challenge 2], or [Challenge 3]?"

**Why it works**: Specific questions lower the barrier to commenting. People know exactly what to respond to.

### Hack #8: Use Odd Numbers in Lists

**Pattern**: "7 ways to..." performs better than "10 ways to..."

**Psychology**: Odd numbers feel more authentic (not artificially rounded). Research shows 7 is the sweet spot for perceived value without overwhelming readers.

**Implementation**: Next time you're making a list post, aim for 5, 7, or 9 items, not 5, 10, or 15.

### Hack #9: The "Bonus Comment" Technique

**What it is**: Post your main content, then immediately add a valuable comment to your own post.

**What to include in your comment**: Additional resource, link, extended insight, or tactical detail.

**Why it works**:

-   Starts the comment count at 1 immediately
-   LinkedIn shows the first comment prominently
-   Provides extra value without overwhelming the main post

**Example**: Post shares a framework. Your first comment: "Here's the free template I use for this: [link]" or "Bonus tip that didn't fit in the main post: [insight]"

---

## Engagement-Boosting Tactics

These hacks happen during and after posting.

### Hack #10: Comment on 5 Posts Before You Post

**The warm-up theory**: Engaging before posting signals to LinkedIn you're active, potentially improving initial distribution.

**Strategic commenting**: Don't comment randomly. Comment on posts from people who typically engage with your content. They'll see you're active and check your profile, potentially seeing your new post.

**Timing**: Do this 15-30 minutes before your scheduled post.

### Hack #11: Respond to EVERY Comment in the First Hour

**Why the first hour matters**: LinkedIn's algorithm weighs early engagement heavily. Your responses count as additional engagement signals.

**Response tactics that generate more engagement**:

-   Ask follow-up questions (extends the thread)
-   Tag relevant people (brings more voices in)
-   Provide additional value (makes people glad they commented)

**Using LiGo for efficient responses**: The [LiGo Chrome Extension](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof) can help generate thoughtful comment replies quickly. Free tool ensures you don't sacrifice quality for speed.

### Hack #12: Tag Strategically (But Don't Overdo It)

**The rule**: Tag 1-3 relevant people maximum. More than that looks spammy.

**When to tag**:

-   Someone you quote or reference in the post
-   An expert whose perspective would add to discussion
-   Someone you collaborated with on the insight

**When NOT to tag**: Random industry leaders hoping for their attention (this backfires and looks desperate).

### Hack #13: The "Controversial Take + Nuance" Pattern

**The formula**: Lead with a bold/controversial statement, then add nuanced explanation.

**Why it works**: Controversial statement gets attention and stops the scroll. Nuance keeps credibility and prevents backlash.

**Example structure**:

"LinkedIn carousels are overrated. [controversial statement]

Here's why: Most people create them wrong. They prioritize design over substance, making 10-slide presentations that could be a single paragraph. [nuance]

But when done right—substantial insights, clear takeaways, minimal fluff—they outperform standard posts 3:1. [balanced take]"

### Hack #14: Cross-Post to Multiple Platforms (With LiGo)

**Why multi-platform matters**: Different audiences are active on different platforms. The same content can reach 3-4x people across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, and Meta.

**Timing strategy**: Post to LinkedIn first (it's pickier about engagement velocity). Then adapt for X, Reddit, Meta within a few hours.

**Platform adaptation**: Each platform has different tone expectations. What works on LinkedIn might need editing for Reddit.

**LiGo's multi-platform support**: The [LiGo Chrome Extension](https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof) works across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, and Meta. Generate platform-appropriate versions of your content efficiently. Free tier covers all four platforms.

### Hack #15: The "Story → Lesson → Question" Structure

**The proven engagement structure**:

1. **Story (first half)**: Personal narrative that establishes context and relatability
2. **Lesson (middle)**: What you learned, the framework, the insight
3. **Question (end)**: Specific question to generate comments

**Why it works**: Stories keep people reading. Lessons provide value. Questions trigger engagement. This structure hits all three engagement drivers.

**Template example**:

"Last month I... [story setup]

What happened was... [story continues]

The lesson? [Key insight or framework]

Have you experienced [specific version of this challenge]?"

---

## Measuring & Optimizing Your Engagement

**Metrics that matter beyond vanity metrics**:

-   **Engagement rate**: (reactions + comments + shares) / impressions
-   **Comment-to-like ratio**: Comments signal deeper engagement
-   **Profile views from post**: Indicates conversion intent
-   **Follower growth rate**: Are engaged readers following you?

**Testing one hack at a time**: Implement one hack, track for 5 posts, compare to baseline. Don't change multiple variables simultaneously or you won't know what works.

**Building your playbook**: Document which hacks work best for your specific audience. What works for B2B SaaS might not work for consulting. Test and track.

**Tools for tracking**: LinkedIn native analytics (free), Shield Analytics ($12/month), or LiGo's chat-based analytics (asks questions in natural language about your data).

**When to double down vs. try something new**: If a hack improves engagement by 30%+, make it standard practice. If no improvement after 10 posts, try a different hack.

---

These 15 hacks aren't theoretical. They're battle-tested tactics from analyzing thousands of high-performing LinkedIn posts and working with 50,000+ professionals on their LinkedIn strategy.

Start with hacks #1, #4, and #11 (seed engagement, formatting, and first-hour responses). These three alone can double your engagement within 2 weeks.

Then layer in additional hacks as you master the basics. Within 30 days of systematic implementation, your LinkedIn engagement will look completely different.

---

## Related Resources

-   [How to Write LinkedIn Comments That Actually Get Replies (2025 Formula)](https://ligoai.com/blog/how-to-write-linkedin-comments-get-replies-2025)
-   [LinkedIn Algorithm 2025: How Comments Impact Your Reach (Data Study)](https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-algorithm-2025-comments-impact-reach-study)
-   [LinkedIn Commenting Schedule: When to Comment for Maximum Reach](https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-commenting-schedule-maximum-reach)
-   [AI LinkedIn Writing: How to Keep Your Authentic Voice (Complete Guide)](https://ligoai.com/blog/ai-linkedin-writing-keep-authentic-voice-guide)
-   [From 0 to 10K Followers: LinkedIn Growth Strategy Using Strategic Comments](https://ligoai.com/blog/0-to-10k-followers-linkedin-growth-strategy-comments)


You post quality content consistently. Your insights are solid. But your engagement numbers stay frustratingly flat while others in your industry seem to effortlessly generate hundreds of reactions and dozens of comments.
The difference isn’t better content. The difference is knowing which small tactical choices dramatically impact LinkedIn’s algorithm and human behavior.
These 15 engagement hacks are the tested tactics that separate mediocre reach from viral potential. None require fancy tools or big budgets. All deliver measurable results when applied systematically.
<h2>How LinkedIn Engagement Actually Works in 2025</h2>
Before the hacks, understand the system you’re optimizing for.
Algorithm basics - The first hour is crucial: LinkedIn’s algorithm tests every post with a small portion of your network in the first 60 minutes. If that test audience engages (especially comments), LinkedIn expands reach. If they don’t, your post dies.
What counts as “engagement”:
<ul>
<li>Comments (highest weight)</li>
<li>Shares (very high weight)</li>
<li>Reactions (moderate weight)</li>
<li>Clicks on “see more” (meaningful signal)</li>
<li>Profile visits from your post (conversion signal)</li>
</ul>
Why engagement begets more engagement: When LinkedIn shows your post to more people, more people engage, which signals LinkedIn to show it to even more people. It’s a flywheel. Your job is getting that flywheel spinning in the first hour.
The compound effect: One post with 2x typical engagement doesn’t just reach 2x people. It often reaches 5-10x people because LinkedIn amplifies what’s already working.
<hr>
<h2>Pre-Posting Engagement Hacks</h2>
These hacks happen before you even click “Post.”
<h3>Hack #1: The “Seed Engagement” Strategy</h3>
What it is: DM 3-5 connections 10 minutes before posting.
The message: “Hey, posting something about [topic] in 10 minutes. Would love your perspective on [specific question].”
Why it works: When these people engage in the first few minutes, LinkedIn’s algorithm sees early engagement velocity and expands reach.
Implementation: Build a “seed engagement” list of 10-15 people who consistently engage with your content. Rotate through them (don’t spam the same 3 every time).
<h3>Hack #2: Post When YOUR Audience is Active (Not Generic Best Times)</h3>
Finding YOUR optimal time: Check LinkedIn analytics to see when your specific audience is online. Generic “best times” don’t account for your unique network.
Testing methodology: Post at different times for 2 weeks. Track impressions and engagement rate (not just total likes). Find your peak windows.
Surprise finding: For many B2B professionals, Saturday mornings outperform Tuesday afternoons because competition is lower.
<h3>Hack #3: The “Document vs Photo” Upload Trick</h3>
What to do: Upload carousels or PDF documents instead of standard image posts.
Why it works: Carousel posts get 3x average engagement because:
<ul>
<li>They keep people on LinkedIn longer (dwell time signal)</li>
<li>Multiple slides create natural stopping points</li>
<li>The swipe action counts as engagement</li>
</ul>
Quick carousel creation: Use Canva’s free LinkedIn carousel templates. 5-7 slides is optimal.
<hr>
<h2>Writing &amp; Formatting Hacks</h2>
Small changes to how you write posts create big engagement differences.
<h3>Hack #4: The Double-Line Break Pattern</h3>
What it is: Add TWO line breaks between every paragraph, not one.
Why it works: Mobile optimization. Most LinkedIn readers are on mobile where dense text is harder to read. Extra white space improves scanability by 40%+.
Visual difference:
Bad: Paragraph1[one break]Paragraph2
Good: Paragraph1[two breaks]Paragraph2
<h3>Hack #5: Start with “I Almost Didn’t Post This”</h3>
The hook: Begin posts with vulnerability signals like “I almost didn’t post this” or “I debated sharing this.”
Psychology: Creates curiosity + authenticity. Readers want to know what you almost hid.
When to use: Personal stories, lessons from failures, contrarian takes.
Example: “I almost didn’t post this. Admitting I wasted $12K on a failed LinkedIn ads experiment isn’t exactly great for my marketing consultant brand. But here’s what that expensive lesson taught me…”
<h3>Hack #6: The “Scroll-Stopper” First Line Formula</h3>
5 proven first-line patterns:
<ol>
<li>Shocking stat: “83% of B2B buyers never respond to cold outreach. Here’s what works instead.”</li>
<li>Bold claim: “Everything you know about LinkedIn posting times is wrong.”</li>
<li>Vulnerable admission: “I almost quit LinkedIn last year. Here’s what changed.”</li>
<li>Specific outcome: “My connection acceptance rate went from 15% to 78% with one change.”</li>
<li>Provocative question: “Why do mediocre LinkedIn posts from CEOs outperform brilliant posts from managers?”</li>
</ol>
<h3>Hack #7: End with a Polarizing Question</h3>
What NOT to ask: “What do you think?” (too generic, generates no responses)
What TO ask: Questions that force a choice or opinion:
<ul>
<li>“Agree or disagree: [controversial statement]?”</li>
<li>“Which matters more: [Option A] or [Option B]?”</li>
<li>“What’s your biggest challenge: [Challenge 1], [Challenge 2], or [Challenge 3]?”</li>
</ul>
Why it works: Specific questions lower the barrier to commenting. People know exactly what to respond to.
<h3>Hack #8: Use Odd Numbers in Lists</h3>
Pattern: “7 ways to…” performs better than “10 ways to…”
Psychology: Odd numbers feel more authentic (not artificially rounded). Research shows 7 is the sweet spot for perceived value without overwhelming readers.
Implementation: Next time you’re making a list post, aim for 5, 7, or 9 items, not 5, 10, or 15.
<h3>Hack #9: The “Bonus Comment” Technique</h3>
What it is: Post your main content, then immediately add a valuable comment to your own post.
What to include in your comment: Additional resource, link, extended insight, or tactical detail.
Why it works:
<ul>
<li>Starts the comment count at 1 immediately</li>
<li>LinkedIn shows the first comment prominently</li>
<li>Provides extra value without overwhelming the main post</li>
</ul>
Example: Post shares a framework. Your first comment: “Here’s the free template I use for this: [link]” or “Bonus tip that didn’t fit in the main post: [insight]”
<hr>
<h2>Engagement-Boosting Tactics</h2>
These hacks happen during and after posting.
<h3>Hack #10: Comment on 5 Posts Before You Post</h3>
The warm-up theory: Engaging before posting signals to LinkedIn you’re active, potentially improving initial distribution.
Strategic commenting: Don’t comment randomly. Comment on posts from people who typically engage with your content. They’ll see you’re active and check your profile, potentially seeing your new post.
Timing: Do this 15-30 minutes before your scheduled post.
<h3>Hack #11: Respond to EVERY Comment in the First Hour</h3>
Why the first hour matters: LinkedIn’s algorithm weighs early engagement heavily. Your responses count as additional engagement signals.
Response tactics that generate more engagement:
<ul>
<li>Ask follow-up questions (extends the thread)</li>
<li>Tag relevant people (brings more voices in)</li>
<li>Provide additional value (makes people glad they commented)</li>
</ul>
Using LiGo for efficient responses: The <a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof">LiGo Chrome Extension</a> can help generate thoughtful comment replies quickly. Free tool ensures you don’t sacrifice quality for speed.
<h3>Hack #12: Tag Strategically (But Don’t Overdo It)</h3>
The rule: Tag 1-3 relevant people maximum. More than that looks spammy.
When to tag:
<ul>
<li>Someone you quote or reference in the post</li>
<li>An expert whose perspective would add to discussion</li>
<li>Someone you collaborated with on the insight</li>
</ul>
When NOT to tag: Random industry leaders hoping for their attention (this backfires and looks desperate).
<h3>Hack #13: The “Controversial Take + Nuance” Pattern</h3>
The formula: Lead with a bold/controversial statement, then add nuanced explanation.
Why it works: Controversial statement gets attention and stops the scroll. Nuance keeps credibility and prevents backlash.
Example structure:
&quot;LinkedIn carousels are overrated. [controversial statement]
Here’s why: Most people create them wrong. They prioritize design over substance, making 10-slide presentations that could be a single paragraph. [nuance]
But when done right—substantial insights, clear takeaways, minimal fluff—they outperform standard posts 3:1. [balanced take]&quot;
<h3>Hack #14: Cross-Post to Multiple Platforms (With LiGo)</h3>
Why multi-platform matters: Different audiences are active on different platforms. The same content can reach 3-4x people across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, and Meta.
Timing strategy: Post to LinkedIn first (it’s pickier about engagement velocity). Then adapt for X, Reddit, Meta within a few hours.
Platform adaptation: Each platform has different tone expectations. What works on LinkedIn might need editing for Reddit.
LiGo’s multi-platform support: The <a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ligo-comments-for-linkedi/dlclgkldbjggemolgmajabobdcofgjof">LiGo Chrome Extension</a> works across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, and Meta. Generate platform-appropriate versions of your content efficiently. Free tier covers all four platforms.
<h3>Hack #15: The “Story → Lesson → Question” Structure</h3>
The proven engagement structure:
<ol>
<li>Story (first half): Personal narrative that establishes context and relatability</li>
<li>Lesson (middle): What you learned, the framework, the insight</li>
<li>Question (end): Specific question to generate comments</li>
</ol>
Why it works: Stories keep people reading. Lessons provide value. Questions trigger engagement. This structure hits all three engagement drivers.
Template example:
&quot;Last month I… [story setup]
What happened was… [story continues]
The lesson? [Key insight or framework]
Have you experienced [specific version of this challenge]?&quot;
<hr>
<h2>Measuring &amp; Optimizing Your Engagement</h2>
Metrics that matter beyond vanity metrics:
<ul>
<li>Engagement rate: (reactions + comments + shares) / impressions</li>
<li>Comment-to-like ratio: Comments signal deeper engagement</li>
<li>Profile views from post: Indicates conversion intent</li>
<li>Follower growth rate: Are engaged readers following you?</li>
</ul>
Testing one hack at a time: Implement one hack, track for 5 posts, compare to baseline. Don’t change multiple variables simultaneously or you won’t know what works.
Building your playbook: Document which hacks work best for your specific audience. What works for B2B SaaS might not work for consulting. Test and track.
Tools for tracking: LinkedIn native analytics (free), Shield Analytics ($12/month), or LiGo’s chat-based analytics (asks questions in natural language about your data).
When to double down vs. try something new: If a hack improves engagement by 30%+, make it standard practice. If no improvement after 10 posts, try a different hack.
<hr>
These 15 hacks aren’t theoretical. They’re battle-tested tactics from analyzing thousands of high-performing LinkedIn posts and working with 50,000+ professionals on their LinkedIn strategy.
Start with hacks #1, #4, and #11 (seed engagement, formatting, and first-hour responses). These three alone can double your engagement within 2 weeks.
Then layer in additional hacks as you master the basics. Within 30 days of systematic implementation, your LinkedIn engagement will look completely different.
<hr>
<h2>Related Resources</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/how-to-write-linkedin-comments-get-replies-2025">How to Write LinkedIn Comments That Actually Get Replies (2025 Formula)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-algorithm-2025-comments-impact-reach-study">LinkedIn Algorithm 2025: How Comments Impact Your Reach (Data Study)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/linkedin-commenting-schedule-maximum-reach">LinkedIn Commenting Schedule: When to Comment for Maximum Reach</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/ai-linkedin-writing-keep-authentic-voice-guide">AI LinkedIn Writing: How to Keep Your Authentic Voice (Complete Guide)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://ligoai.com/blog/0-to-10k-followers-linkedin-growth-strategy-comments">From 0 to 10K Followers: LinkedIn Growth Strategy Using Strategic Comments</a></li>
</ul>

Boost your LinkedIn engagement with 15 proven hacks tested in 2025. Data-backed tactics for more likes, comments, shares, and profile views.

Posts tagged: LinkedIn Engagement

LinkedIn Comment Generator Tools Compared: Free vs Paid (2025)

How to Write LinkedIn Comments That Actually Get Replies (2025 Formula)

15 LinkedIn Engagement Hacks That Actually Work in 2025